STATE OF HP v. AJAY BAHADUR KHARKA
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-12-17. STATE OF HP v. AJAY BAHADUR KHARKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:15045 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 150 of 2021 Date of Decision: 17. 12. 2024 State of H. P ... Appellant Versus Ajay Bahadur Kharka ... Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Appellant : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General. For the Respondent : None. For Union of India : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel. HC Vinod No. 192, Police Station, Theog, District Shimla, H. P present in person. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge, (oral) Cr. MP No. 5202 of 2024 and Cr. MP No. __ of 2022 (Cr. MP(ST) No. 10865 of 2024) The respondent has been declared as proclaimed offender vide order dated 13. 11. 2024, therefore, these applications are deemed to have been allowed and disposed of. Cr. Appeal NO. 150 of 2021 2.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the status report received from SHO, Police Station, Theog, Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:15045 ) District Shimla along with documents appended thereto, wherein it has been stated that after making all out efforts, no movable or immovable property has been found in the ownership and possession of respondent-Ajay Bahadur Kharka. 3. Respondent has already been declared proclaimed offender on 13. 11. 2024. As no movable or immovable property could be traced in his name, therefore, no further action is required at this stage. 4. Therefore, the present appeal is closed and disposed of with a direction to the appellant/State to continue the efforts to trace and apprehend the respondent, with liberty for revival of the appeal as and when respondent is apprehended and produced in the Court.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge th 17 December, 2024 (saurav pathania)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.