RONAK KUMAR GARG v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ARUN MONGA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-07-30. RONAK KUMAR GARG v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:31335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 3140/2024 1. Ronak Kumar Garg S/o Shri Chand Kiran Garg, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Station Road, Pratap Choraya, Fatehnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Anuj Garg S/o Shri Chand Kiran Garg, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Station Road, Pratap Choraya, Fatehnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Girdhari Gameti S/o Shri Nanu, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Sanwad, Fatehnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Smt. Shanta Bai W/o Shri Vishan Singh, R/o Heera Was, Fatehnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 3141/2024 1. Radhey Shyam Lohar S/o Shri Chand Mal Lohar, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Lohar Mohalla, Changedi, Dist. Udaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Nitesh Puri Goswami S/o Shri Suresh Puri Goswami, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Brahampun Colony, Fatehnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 3.
Nitesh Pahadiya S/o Shri Madan Lal Pahadiya, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ward No. 9, Khatik Mohalla, Wakya Ji Ka Darwaja, Sanwar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Shivam Singh Krishnawat S/o Shri Suveer Singh Krishnawat, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Fatehnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Smt. Shanta Bai W/o Shri Vishan Singh, R/o Heera Was, Fatehnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Mr. Ramdev Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, P. P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order 30/07/2024 [2024:RJ-JD:31335] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3140/2024] 1. Instant misc. petitions under Section 482 CrPC are filed for quashing of the FIR No. 67/2024 dated 29. 04. 2024 registered at Police Station Fatehnagar, District Udaipur under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC. 2. At the very outset, learned Public Prosecutor states that after investigation the allegations against the petitioners were found to be false.
Resultantly, a negative final report has already been prepared. The same shall be filed in due course before the competent court. 3. In the premise, no ground to interfere are made out as the competent court will decide on the cancellation of the FIR in accordance with law upon filing of the final report as stated aforesaid. 4. Petition is disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ARUN MONGA),J 7-AnilKC/- Whether Fit for Reporting – Yes / No
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.