K. SIVANANDAM (DIED) v. KRISHNAVENI AMMAL
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2024-12-18. K. SIVANANDAM (DIED) v. KRISHNAVENI AMMAL. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
A. S. No. 631 of 2007 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18. 12. 2024 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN A. S. No. 631 of 2007 and all connected miscellaneous petitions 1. K. Sivanandam (Died) 2. Pushpakantha (Died) 3. Tamilselvi 4. Sudhayakumar 5. Pugazhendi 6. Rajkumar [A1 Died. A2 to A6 are brought on record as LRs st of deceased 1 appellant vide order of Court dated 31. 03. 2023 made in CMP. Nos. 3995, 3858,3984, 3998 and 4000 of 2022] [A2 Died. A3 to A6 are already on record as LRs of deceased A2. Memo recorded, vide order of Court dated 19. 06. 2023 made in A. S. No. 631 of 2007] ... Appellants Vs. 1/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis A. S. No. 631 of 2007 1. Krishnaveni Ammal 2. J. Kalyani 3. J. Jagannathan 4. J. Malathi 5. J. Rajeshwari 6. K. V. Ponnuvelu (Died) 7. Jayalakshmi 8. Selvam 9. Rani 10. Ponselvi 11. Porselvan [R6 Died.
Respondents 9 to 11 are brought on th record as LRs of deceased 6 respondent vide order of Court dated 24. 01. 2023 in CMP. Nos. 18620, 18621, 18622, 18623 & 18624 in CMP. Nos. 3995, 3998, 4000, 3858 &3984 and order dated 31. 03. 2023 made in CMP. Nos. 3995, 3858, 3984, 3998 & 4000 of 2022. ] ... Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 14. 02. 2007 passed by the Principal District Judge, Chengleput in O. S. No. 81 of 2005. 2/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis A. S. No. 631 of 2007 For Appellants : Mr. R. Ganesan For Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr. S. M. Loganathan th For 6 Respondent : Mr. Devaraj For Respondents 7 to 8 : Me. Mr. M. Sriram ***** J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. SUBRAMANIAN, J. ) Despite having taken several adjournments, the learned counsel for the appellant is not ready. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
After passing the order of dismissal of the appeal, the learned counsel says he is ready to argue. We do not propose to hear him now. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R. S. M. , J. ) (C. K. , J. ) 18. 12. 2024 dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : No Non-Speaking order To The Principal District Judge, Chengleput. 3/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis A. S. No. 631 of 2007 R. SUBRAMANIAN, J. and C. KUMARAPPAN, J. dsa A. S. No. 631 of 2007 18. 12. 2024 4/4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.