RUMEL SINGH RANA v. THE STATE
Court: High Court of Delhi
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Delhi judgment dated 2020-06-26. RUMEL SINGH RANA v. THE STATE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
$~BAIL-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1428/2020 & CRL. M. A. Nos. 8263-64/2020 RUMEL SINGH RANA .... Petitioner Through : Mr. Jatan Singh, Adv. versus THE STATE .... Respondent Through : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with Insp. Anupam Bhushan, I. O. , P. S. Bawana. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER O R D E R % 26. 06. 2020 [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] Crl. M. A. No. 8263/2020 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Crl. M. A. No. 8264/2020 2. Allowed, subject to the petitioner curing the deficiencies referred to in the captioned application within five days of the lockdown qua this Court being lifted. BAIL APPLN. 1428/2020 3. Issue notice to the respondent/State. 3. 1 Mr. Ravi Nayak accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/State. 3. 2 Mr. Nayak, on instructions of the Investigating Officer i. e. Inspector Anupam Bhushan, P. S. Bawana, says that the medical record appended to the captioned petition has been verified.
BAIL APPLN. 1428/2020 page 1 of 2 Signature Not Verified digitally signed byVIPIN signing date27. 06. 2020 01:46 4. The record shows that vide order dated 12. 05. 2020, passed in Bail Appl. No. 882/2020, the petitioner was enlarged on interim bail for a period spanning 45 days on account of his medical condition. 5. The petitioner, in the captioned petition, says that since the medical condition of the petitioner continues to remain the same, his interim bail should be extended given the fact that there is a likelihood of him being affected by the Coronavirus pandemic. 5. 1 The petitioner appears to be suffering from a disease which has affected his kidneys. Coronavirus pandemic has spiked in the city. Given the petitioner’s health status, at present, his plea for extension of bail seems reasonable. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner’s interim bail, granted vide order dated 12. 05. 2020, to which I have made a reference above, is extended for another 30 days with effect from 29. 06.
2020, on the same terms and conditions as contained in the aforementioned order of this Court i. e. order dated 12. 05. 2020. 6. 1 Furthermore, the petitioner will refrain from establishing contact with any witness and/or the family member(s) of the victim. 6. 2 The petitioner will, however, contact the Investigating Officer i. e. Inspector Anupam Bhushan, P. S. Bawana [Mobile Number: +91-9868093517] on every first day of the week i. e. Monday while he is out on bail. 7. The Registry will communicate the order passed today, electronically, to the concerned Jail Superintendent. 8. The captioned petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J JUNE 26, 2020/Aj/KK Click here to check corrigendum, if any BAIL APPLN. 1428/2020 page 2 of 2 Signature Not Verified digitally signed byVIPIN signing date27. 06. 2020 01:46
Source: High Court of Delhi. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.