MR VIKRAM PRABHAKAR v. THE BHARATH CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-27. MR VIKRAM PRABHAKAR v. THE BHARATH CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 16275 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 16275 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MR. VIKRAM PRABHAKAR S/O. LATE MR. B. L. PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO. 36/1, TH 8 MAIN TH 7 CROSS, RMV EXTENSION SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 080 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by (BY SRI. VASUDEVAN H. N. , ADVOCATE) SUVARNA T Location: HIGH AND: COURT OF KARNATAKA 1. THE BHARATH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER TH NO. 30, 15 CROSS RD 3 BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 011 2. MR MANJUNATH - 2 - WP No. 16275 of 2024 S/O GOPALRAJU AGED MAJOR 3. MR RAKSHITH M S/O MANJUANTH AGED MAJOR REPONDENTS NO. 2 AND 3 ARE R/AT NO. 12/A, ST 1 MAIN V V MOHALLA MYSORE - 570 002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MOUNIA M. , ADVOCTE FOR SRI. K. V. LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS W. P.
IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE SALE NOTICE DTD. 30. 01. 2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNX-D AND ALL FURTHER ACTION PURSUANT TO SALE NOTICE DATED 30. 01. 2024. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - WP No. 16275 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers: "a) ISSUE A writ in the nature of certiorari to set aside the sale notice dated. 30. 01. 2024 issued by the respondent vide Annexure-D and all further action pursuant to sale notice dated 30. 01. 2024. b) Issue A writ of appropriate nature to set aside sale confirmation letter Vide No. BCB/MATH/207/23-24 dated 19. 02. 2024, vide Annexure-E, issued by the 1st Respondent; and c) PASS such other orders as may be deemed appropriate in the ends of justice and equity. " 2.
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the DRT. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the sale has already taken place. In that view of the matter, this court is passing the following: - 4 - WP No. 16275 of 2024 ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the DRT. ii. The petitioner shall approach the DRT within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. ii. The petitioner shall have the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. iii. Pending IAs. , if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No. : 1 Sl No. : 5
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.