CHANANA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: KULDEEP MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. CHANANA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38282] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7333/2026 CNR: RJHC010817652026 | URN: CRLMP / 12653U / 2026 Chanana Ram S/o Uttama Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Meghrikhsar, Panasar, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan -345024 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Directorate, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Rajasthan Garmin Bank, Through Its Branch Bhaniyana, V/p- Bhaniyana, Via Pokran, Pokran, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan- 345024 3. Reserve Bank Of India, Through Its Regional Director Reserve Bank Of India, 6 Sansad Marg, New Delhi 110001 4. National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, Represented By Its Director, National Highway- 8, Mahalipur, New Delhi, Pin- 110037. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kishore Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 1. The instant criminal misc.
petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “ It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction: i. The respondents may be directed to complete the investigation from the petitioner (if any) and allow the petitioner to operate his bank account on provisional basis without any interruption. ii. The petitioner holding a Bank Account No. : 11313287523, IFSC Code: RMGB0000280, Customer Name: Chanana Ram Is in The Respondent to the Rajasthan Gramin Bank ,Bhaniyana,Pokran Branch, Jaisalmer.. Kindly direct the respondents to unfreeze account and remove the debit freeze. [2026:RJ-JP:38282] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7333/2026] iii. Kindly allow the petitioner to operate his account and use his own amount deposited in the bank. Any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and... ” 2.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this criminal misc. petition with a direction to the Rajasthan Garmin Bank (Respondent No. 2) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the remaining balance. 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order. 4.
Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:38282] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7333/2026] 7. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 263/Himanshu Singh
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.