MONTY DHOLI S/O MAHAVEER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-19. MONTY DHOLI S/O MAHAVEER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:52159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14237/2024 Anil Kumar Bairwa S/o Shri Munshi Lal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bairwa Mohalla, Village Sundar Nagar, Indragarh, P. s. Indragarh, District Bundi. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15660/2024 Monty Dholi S/o Mahaveer, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Shyodanpura, Police Station Indrgarh, District Bundi (Raj. ). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena Mr. Pallav Jhalani for Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/12/2024 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 B. N. S. S. , in connection with F. I. R. No.
735/2024 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 331(3) & 305(a) of BNS. [2024:RJ-JP:52159] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14237/2024] 2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsels further submit that co-accused namely; Vishnu Bharti has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 12. 12. 2024. Counsels also submit that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the accused-petitioners are in custody since long. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar and also the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that co-accused namely; Vishnu Bharti has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 12. 12.
2024, more particularly the fact that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the accused-petitioners are in custody since long, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. These bail applications are, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when [2024:RJ-JP:52159] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14237/2024] called upon to do so. 7. The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /24-25
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.