NISHANT SINGH PARIHAR MINOR THROUGH HIS FATHER SHRI SANTOSH SINGH PARIHAR v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-29. NISHANT SINGH PARIHAR MINOR THROUGH HIS FATHER SHRI SANTOSH SINGH PARIHAR v. THE STATE OF MADHYA...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 29 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 1796 of 2024 BETWEEN:- NISHANT SINGH PARIHAR MINOR THROUGH HIS FATHER SHRI SANTOSH SINGH PARIHAR S/O SHRI SANTOSH SINGH PARIHAR, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT BAIJAL KOTHI MORAR, GIRD , GWALIOR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI SANJAY SHARMA - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPATMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, SCHOOL EDUCATION VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. HEAD MASTER GOVT. GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL TIKONIYA MORAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. P R I N C I PA L HIGHER SEONDARY SCHOOL TIKONIYA MORAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI S. S.
KUSHWAH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- "i) That, the respondents No. 2 and 3 may kindly be dir3ected to Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETU Signing time: 1/30/2024 5:30:58 PM make the correction of petitioner's father and mother name as Shri Santosh Singh Parihar and Smt. malti Parihar in the school record, mark-sheet and admit card issued for the purpose of appearing in the forthcoming exam. (ii) Any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case be granted to the petitioner. Costs be awarded. " Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in respect of the petitioner's request, he has also preferred a representation/request letter dated 05. 10. 2023 but the same has not been decided till date by the respondents.
A limited prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner that if the respondent No . 3 is directed to decide his pending representation/request letter dated 05. 10. 2023 (Annexure P/8) in accordance with law in a time bound manner, his grievance would be redressed. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents/State submits that if such directions are issued, he has no objection. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to decide the pending representation/request letter dated 05. 10. 2023 of the petitioner (Annexure P/8) by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, petition is disposed of.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. E-copy/certified copy as per rules. Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETU Signing time: 1/30/2024 5:30:58 PM (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE neetu Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETU Signing time: 1/30/2024 5:30:58 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.