AKBAR HUSSAIN SAYYED v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DCP
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2025-12-29. AKBAR HUSSAIN SAYYED v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DCP. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
26-WP-17598-2025. doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 17598 OF 2025 Akbar Hussain Sayyed ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Through DCP Zone-6, Chembur, Mumbai ... Respondent __________ Mr. Mohammad Ibraheem K. M. , learned Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Prajakta Shinde, learned A. P. P. for the State/Respondent. Mr. Rajendra Chawhan, Dy. Commissioner a/w Mr. Vijay Makarand, Asst. Revenue Officer are present in the Court. __________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. [VACATION COURT] th DATE : 29 DECEMBER, 2025. P. C. : 1. This matter was heard on 26. 12. 2025 and 27. 12. 2025. On 27. 12. 2025, the matter was adjourned to afford an opportunity to the learned APP for the State to take instructions with regards the time period for disposal of the Appeal filed by the Petitioner under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. 2. Today, Ms.
Prajakta Shinde, learned APP for the State on instructions submits that the Appeal filed by the Petitioner under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, shall be decided and disposed of by the Appellate Authority within a period of one week from today. Statement made by Ms. Prajakta Shinde, learned APP for the State is accepted. 3. Ms. Prajakta Shinde, learned APP for the State by referring to Gitalaxmi Page 1 of 2 26-WP-17598-2025. doc the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, more particularly Schedule-D, Chapter-I (Election Rules) points out to Rule 9(3), to submit that the nomination papers can be filed even by the proposer or seconder. She by relying on the said provision further submits that in the event the Petitioner intents to file his nomination papers, he can take recourse to the aforesaid provisions. 4. In view of the statement made by Ms. Prajakta Shinde, learned APP for the State, Mr.
Mohammad Ibraheem, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the grievance of the Petitioner is presently resolved and this the present Petition can be disposed of. 5. Appeal filed by the Petitioner under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, be decided on or before 05. 01. 2026. 6. At the request of Mr. Mohammad Ibraheem, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, Writ Petition No. 17598 of 2025 is disposed of. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025. 12. 30 10:37:32 +0530 Gitalaxmi Page 2 of 2
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.