Dilip Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-04-27. Dilip Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10044 of 2024 ====================================================== Dilip Kumar Singh Son of Ram Pukar Singh, resident of Village- Kurwan, P. S. - Narari Kala Khurd, District- Aurangabad, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Directorate of Land Acquisition, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad. 4. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad. 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Nabinagar, Power Generating Company Limited, its office located at Main Gate Sasna, P. S. - Nanari Kala Khurd Circle- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Addl.
Advocate General (7) For respondent no. 05 : Mr. Amaresh Kr. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Narayan, Advocate Ms. Deeksha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 27-04-2026 Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for direction to the authority concerned particularly to Respondent No. 3 to refer the matter before LARRA, Gaya under Section 64(1) of the RTFCLARR Act, 2013 on the application being filed by the petitioner on merit and the LARA, Gaya be directed to dispose the same within stipulated period Patna High Court CWJC No. 10044 of 2024(3) dt. 27-04-2026 2/2 as per Section 60(4) of the RTFCLARR Act, 2013. ” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that his case be also considered and disposed of in the light of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench in Kumar Ohm vs.
The State of Bihar & Ors. (CWJC No. 2743 of 2023) dated 12. 07. 2023. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it. 5. The relevant portion of the aforesaid order passed in Kumar Ohm (supra) read as follows: “Considering the circumstances, the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad is directed to consider the case of petitioner under Section 64 of the RFCTLARRA, 2013 and shall pass order on merit and shall refer the matter for reference before LARRA, Gaya. With this observation and direction, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off. ” 6. In that background, the aforesaid writ petition is also disposed of in the same term. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.