RAJENDRA NARAYAN TRIPATHY v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-07. RAJENDRA NARAYAN TRIPATHY v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 9854 of 2026 Rajendra Narayan Tripathy ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Amartya Mishra -versus- State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. U. C. Jena, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 07. 04. 2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ application as well as the documents annexed thereto. 3.
The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer: “Under the above circumstances, it is humbly prayed that the writ petition may be allowed; (A) a writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ may be issued directing the opposite parties to release the differential arrear pension of the petitioner in his favour as indicated in Annexure:3 within a time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court; (B) And any other order / orders or direction / Page 1 of 3. directions may be issued so as to give complete relief to the petitioner; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall remain ever pray. ” 4. In course of hearing of the writ application, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner ventilating his grievance has submitted representation before the District Education Officer, Jajpur, Opposite Party No. 3 under Annexure-4.
It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said representation is pending as of now. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No. 3 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-4 within a stipulated period of time. 5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection if the representation of the Petitioner is considered by the Opposite Party No. 3, which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time. 6. Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party No. 3 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-4 within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Opposite Party No.
3 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-4 by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No. 3 be also communicated to the Petitioner within ten days thereafter. In the event it is found that the Petitioner is entitled to the differential arrear pension Page 2 of 3. necessary follow up steps be taken by the Opposite Party No. 3 to ensure that the amount which is due and admissible to the Petitioner sanction and disburse in his favour within a period of four weeks thereafter, if there is no other legal impediment. 7. With the aforesaid observation/ direction, the writ application stands disposed of. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A. K. Mohapatra ) Judge Sisir Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIR KUMAR SETHI Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANCE Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 09-Apr-2026 11:22:28 Page 3 of 3.
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.