VEVA SADHNA DUBEY v. MUKESH KUMAR DUBEY
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2026-03-06. VEVA SADHNA DUBEY v. MUKESH KUMAR DUBEY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA th ON THE 15 OF DECEMBER, 2023 MISC. PETITION No. 2395 of 2021 BETWEEN:- VEVA SADHNA DUBEY W/O LATE VIJAY KUMR DUBEY, D/O LATE POORNANAND DUBEY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEAR S, OCCUPATION: HOUSE WORK, WARD NO. 10, MUKHARJI WARD, GURAIYA MOHALLA, SIHORA, DISTT. JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI R. K. TIWARI- ADVOCATE) AND 1. MUKESH KUMAR DUBEY S/O LATE POORNANAND DUBEY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: KRISHI, R/O WARD NO. 8, BRAMHANPURA VISHNUDATT MOHALLA, SIHORA, DISTT. JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. THE STATE OF M. P. THROUGH DISTRICT C O LLEC TO R , DISTT. JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (NONE FOR RESPONDENT NO.
1 THOUGH SERVED AND SHRI GAJENDRA PARASHAR- PANEL LAWYER FOR RESPONDENT/STATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed against orders dated 05. 06. 2021 and 30. 06. 2021 passed by 1st Civil Judge Class-II, Sihora, District Jabalpur and II Additional District Judge, Sihora, District Jabalpur in RCSA No. 47/2021 and MCA No. 5/2021 respectively. Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR Signing time: 15-12-2023 18:28:40 2. The petitioner is the plaintiff who had filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C. P. C. Her application was rejected by trial Court by order dated 05. 06. 2021 and the miscellaneous appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of C. P. C. was dismissed by order dated 30. 06. 2021 and the prayer for temporary injunction was refused. 3. This Court by interim order dated 09. 09. 2021 has directed the parties to maintain status quo.
The said interim order is still in existence. 4. None appears for respondent No. 1 to oppose the petition. 5. The Suit was filed on 06. 05. 2021 and two and half years have passed but the stage of the suit is not known. 6. Since, the parties have been directed to maintain status quo and that order is in operation for the last two years and three months, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by deciding this miscellaneous petition on merits. 7. Accordingly, by affirming the order dated 09. 09. 2021, it is directed that the trial Court shall positively decide the suit within a period of 9 months from today. 8. The petitioner is directed to submit a copy of this order before the trial Court within a period of 15 days from today, failing which the protection granted to the petitioner shall automatically come to an end. 9.
In case if require, the trial Court shall proceed further on day to day basis and shall ensure that no unnecessary adjournment is granted to any of the parties without any reasonable reason. 10. With aforesaid observations, petition is finally disposed of. (G. S. AHLUWALIA) Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR Signing time: 15-12-2023 18:28:40 JUDGE AL Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR Signing time: 15-12-2023 18:28:40
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.