MONOWARA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2026-03-29. MONOWARA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010033032026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/798/2026 MONOWARA BEGUM W/O LATE ANOWAR HUSSAIN RESIDENT OF PHALIHAMARI PAM, PO PHALIHAMARI PATHER, PS BHURAGAON, DIST MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER SECRETARY TOTHE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DISASTER MANAGEMENTDEPARTMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI- 06. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 3:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEYS RUPNAGAR GUWAHATI 22 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON ASSAM 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BHURAGAON REVENUE CIRCLE PO BHURAGAON DIST MORIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. KHAIRUL ISLAM, MR. N HOQUE Page No. # 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, SC, FINANCE,GA, ASSAM Linked Case : WP(C)/6273/2024 MD.
ANOWAR HUSSAIN S/O LATE SULTAN AHMED RESIDENT OF PHALIHAMARI PAM PO PHALIHAMARI PATHER PS BHURAGAON DIST MORIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 3:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEYS RUPNAGAR GUWAHATI 22 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON ASSAM 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BHURAGAON REVENUE CIRCLE PO BHURAGAON DIST MORIGAON ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR H GUPTA Advocate for : SC Page No. # 3/3 REVENUE appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER 30. 03. 2026 Mr. N. Hoque, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Interlocutory Application. Mr. R. Dhar, learned State Counsel and Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 3 are present. Prayer for withdrawal is accepted.
Accordingly, the Interlocutory Application stands disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.