RAHUL SINGH YADAV v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. RAHUL SINGH YADAV v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 2568 of 2024 BETWEEN:- RAHUL SINGH YADAV S/O SHRI SHANKAR YADAV, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PATWARI R/O INFRONT OF TEHSIL BALDEOGARH, DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI PRAVESH NAVERIYA - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF MP VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. COLLECTOR TIKAMGARH, DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER BALDEVGARH, DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI DARSHAN SONI - GOVT. ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India making a prayer that respondent No. 2 i. e.
Collector, Tikamgarh be ordered to consider and decide his representation in respect of transfer order dated 07. 07. 2023. 2. Counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that petitioner has recently been relieved on 19. 01. 2024. It is also submitted that no other person has been transferred and posted in place of petitioner and post is vacant. 3. Government Advocate appearing for State submitted that representation filed by petitioner shall be considered by respondents in accordance with law. 4. Heard the counsel for the parties. 5. Petitioner has already been relieved. 6. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that respondent No. 2 shall consider and decide the representation of petitioner by passing a reasonable and speaking order within period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. Order be communicated to petitioner. 7.
Petitioner is at liberty to file fresh representation along with documents before respondent No. 2 within period of seven days. 8. No opinion is expressed on merits of the case. 9. With aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed off. 10. Certified copy as per rules. (VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE sp/- SUNIL KUMAR PATEL 2024. 02. 02 17:22:31 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.