Skip to main content
LawSphereX

KARTIKESWAR DASH v. STATE OF ODISHA

Court: High Court of Orissa

Bench: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-10. KARTIKESWAR DASH v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 32538 of 2023 Kartikeswar Dash …. Petitioner Ms. S. Dash, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Panda, ASC Mr. P. K. Pattanaik, Adv. for O. P. 2 CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 10. 04. 2026 Order No. 06. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Even though the present Writ Petitioner has been filed inter alia challenging order dtd. 18. 09. 2025 so passed under Annexure-5, but in course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that he does not intend to challenge the order any further and in the alternate he may be permitted to make a fresh application before Opposite Party No. 2 to get the benefit of leave salary, as the said claim has been rejected on the ground that Petitioner failed to disclose the period of leave not sanctioned due to proper verification.

// 2 // 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that he be permitted to make a fresh application by disclosing the period of leave not sanctioned before the authority for its consideration . 5. Mr. P. K. Pattnaik, learned counsel appearing for the Corporation has no serious objection to the course of action proposed. 6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition permits the Petitioner to make a fresh application so far as leave salary is concerned by giving the detailed of the leave not sanctioned due to proper verification. 6. 1. It is observed that if any such representation will be filed within a period of two (2) weeks hence, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such application. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 7.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Judge Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Subrat Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 16-Apr-2026 11:40:42

Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.