Shaik Badar Begum, v. The State of Telangana.
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-02-16. Shaik Badar Begum, v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS CRIMINAL PETITIO NN O: 1996 OF 2026 Between: Shaik Badar Begum, Wo Shaik Jabbar, Aged about 45 years' Occ Housewi. fe,R/o. H. No. 8-14-23lC,DanammaHills,OwaisiHills' tr/lailardevpally, Raiendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana ... Petitioner/Accused AND ,l. ThestateofTelangana''RepbyitsPublicProsecutor,HighCourtforthe State of Telangana, At HYderabad 2 Syed Waiid, S7o. Haroon, Aged about 30 years, Occ Labour' R/o H No 1-1-rctUe, Rakasipet, Bodhan Nizamabad District - 503185 ... Respondents/Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the tVlemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in s. c. No. 31 of 2024 on the file of the in the interest of justice' Assistant Sessions Judge, Bodhan, t. A.
NO: 2 OF 2026 PetitionunderSection52BofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances of criminal Petition, the High court may stated in the [r/emorandum of Grounds bepleasedtostayallfurtherproceedingsincludingtheappearanceof. the petiiioner rn S. C. No. 3t of ZO24 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Bodhan. This Petrtion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargUmentsofMrCSHARAN VEERAMALLA' REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. JITHENDER RAO None on behalf of respondent No 1 and the Additional Public Prosecutor appeared for the ResPondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HTGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF'TI ] ,ANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENI\ ,\S RAO CRIMTNAL PETI'TION No. 1996 of 20)( Date:16. 02. 2026 Between: Shaik Badar Begum . Petitioner AND 'felangana, The State of Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad and another.
Respondents ORDER This Crirninal Petition is filed by the petiti, ,ner/accused No. 3, seeking to quash the proceedings in S. C. I'l r 3l of 2024 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judgc Bodhan 2. Upon lterusal of the hnal report, it rertals that the Investigating Officer has not filed the final rep<,r t against the petrtroner. In the final repofi, it is specifically nr :ntioned that LW-15 made all efforts to apprehend accused lirt. 3, but her whereabouts are not known. It is further stated I Ltrt whenever accused No. 3 is apprsft a supplernentary charge wiil be sheet fired against n... '"'ot'' 3. When this Cor raised a query ro the Ir rhe peririone. . "ru. ln the maintainrr,;";;":;J: crirninar petition,,,o'"' absence offiling ofa final report, Iearned the counser for t o""t'o'er soughf permission court to of this withdraw ,n. n" Petition with liberry rhe rernedies to avail avairabre ,,,ff. 4. permission is accorded. 5.
Accordingly, the i petition is dismissed withdrawn, as granting riber ty as sought for. Pending miscellar leous applications' if any, shail crosed. 562n6 iK,Ti? iY#8,'J,HF //TRUE COPY// 6 SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judicial First Cl 2 rhe station n",". J;:J":ffi 1#H"::H::,:. _# 3. One CC to Mr. C SH,ARAN REDDY' Advocate toPuc1 r*o cD 1. copies (c^ -p lr0 trl€ Rr. Z(, rutl,f. pro,A. rbr. HBh rrBrt . uuy,{ (uuYt fov {. nr +}€ 61ot< of T" (olro* \qr co,rr) HIGH COURT DATED: 1610212026 (). I-IE S Dl f6 t o (. ) ,' ) i )n)t * al t :i4 ORDER f CRLP. No. 1996 of 2026 Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is Il ismissed as Withdrawn, granting liberty as sot ght for. ,f"o a a) &
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.