PENUMATSA SURAPA RAJU v. PENUMATSA SURYA PADMAVATHI AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: NINALA JAYASURYA,SUMATHI JAGADAM
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-10-16. PENUMATSA SURAPA RAJU v. PENUMATSA SURYA PADMAVATHI AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR \ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 132 OF 2018 Appeal filed under section 96 of CPC. , against the Judgment and Decree dated 31-10-2017 in OS. No. 28 of 2015 passed by the X Additional District Jugde, West Godavari District at Narsapur. Between: about 61 Penumatsa Surapa Raju, S/o. Late Satyanaraya Raju, aged years, Occ: Business, R/o. 3E, Dhuvatara Apartments, Behind Medinova Hospital, Rajbhavan Road, Hyderabad ... Appellant/Defendant No. 1 AND 1. Penumatsa Surya Padmavathi, W/o. Late Satyanarayana Raju, aged about 78 years, Occ; House hold, R/o. D. No. 2-1-51,Lajapatrai Pet, Palakol, West Godavari District ... Respondent/Plaintiff aged 2. Kunumuri Vijaya Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. K. V. Sl. N. Raju, R/o. D. No.
2-1-51, Lajapatrial Pet, Ward years, Occ: House-wife Palakol, West Godavari District ... Respondent/Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2017 circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the the High Court may in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, and Decree stay of all further proceedings in executing the Judgment X Additional 2017 passed in OS. No. 28 of 2015 on the file of the Narsapur pending disposal of the main appeal Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Venkat Rao Patil Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Sri Rama Mohan Palanki Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Sri M Prudhvi Raju The Court made the following: JUDGMENT / APHC011027312017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3494] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM APPEAL SUIT No. 132 of 2018 Between: 1. PENUMATSA SURAPA RAJU, S/0.
LATE SATYANARAYA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,OCC-BUSINESS, R/0. 3E,DHUVATARA APARTMENTS, BEHIND MEDINOVA HOSPITAL, RAJBHAVAN ROAD,HYDERABAD ... APPELLANT AND 1. PENUMATSA SURYA PADMAVATHI AND ANOTHER, W/0. LATE SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE HOLD, R/0. D. NO. 2-1-51,LAJAPATRAI PET,PALAKOL WG DISTRICT 2. KUNUMURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI KUMARI, W/0. K. V. S. L. N. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE HOLD, R/0. D. NO. 2-1-51, LAJAPATRIAL PET,WARD NO. 3,PALAKOL,WG DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS in OS. Setting aside the judgment and decree dated 31-10-2017 at No. 28 of 2015 passed by the X Addl. District Judge, WG District Narsapur and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2017 circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the the High Court may stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the judgment be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in executing on the file of the and decree dt. 31-10-2017 passed in OS. No. 28 of 2015 i X Addl.
District Judge, Narsapur pending disposal of the main appeal and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. VENKAT RAO PAUL Counsel for the Respondents: 1. RAMA MOHAN PALANKI 2. PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Though the appeal is listed under the caption “For Dismissal there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. 2. Hence, the appeal suit is dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The X Additional District Judge, Narsapur, West Godavari District. 2. One CC to Sri. Venkat Rao Patil Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Rama Mohan Palanki Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V.
R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Three CD Copies SAM vna HIGH COURT DATED: 16/10/2024 JUDGMENT AS. No. 132 of 2018 m g 2 6 our 202'| ri ^ . Curreiii aecuo** DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.