Kota Kumar v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-23. Kota Kumar v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HYDERABAD HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) OF DECEMBER WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI OF 2020 WRIT PETITION NO: 23046 Between: years' Occu' Business' R/o H'No' 6-1- Kota Kumar, S/o Ravamallu, Age' 37 Peddapalli prashantnna'glr,"'6biJuarirf,aili, F{amagundam IVlandal, B3/. 105, (Karim nagar)District. ... PETITIONER AND by its Principle Secretary' Revenue Department' 1 The State of Telanqana, Rep. Secretariat B. R. K Bhavan, Hyderabad ' 2 The District collector, Peddapalli District, Peddapalli (Karimanagar) District Corporation Rep by its Commissioner' 3 The Ramaqundam t\,4unicipal Ramaoundam, Peddapalli (Karimnagar) Dlstrlcl [,4andal, Ramagundam, Peddapalli (Karimanagar) 4 rne t]r,sitoar, Ramagundam District. ... RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiIedtherewith,theHighCoUrtmaybeplea.
sedto particularly one in the nature of Writ of issue a writ order or Oirection more l\,4andamus, declaring tnat ine action of the of the 3rd respondent in not issuing the 44lA'Ac0-inresogc! of. anSxtentAc1-o0inSvNo N;or;;i;"certificite(r"roCl Gts total of Ac. 1-20 n" o-io Gts in sy. No. 44tA14l2 1;Gi. ';; sy No. 44tA14t1r*j Ramagundam' Revenue Village, Municipal Corporation oi tanO, situated at Malkapur the representations ieodapatti o! stri9!! v not,considerins Rr;";;;;;; Mandal, petitioner 05lO6t2O2O respectively, duly Oul"O O+lOflZo2d and made by the by the respondent No. 4 dated 01/06/2020 issued . "nriouii'"g the letter 612261102. 0 addressed to the Respond"niNo. S seeking for issuance of No Objection certificate in favor of the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 oF 2020 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe -p"tition,' the the nigh court may be pleased to. direct ariaavit iireo in support ot ir," made. by the of th" t"p'"sentations respondent No.
3, to dispose 'o4lo3l2o2o "onriJ"t'"nO with in the stipulated and o5to6t2o20, respectively, p"jii. ""i ort" d report-Leiore this Hon,bte court, pending disposal of the above ,no submit a ["iioo writ petition. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & Counsel for the Responaent t'to' URBAN DEVELOPMENT 2 & 3: GP FOR REVENUE Cou". "f for the Respondent Nos' SC FOR MC iounsel for the Respondent No' 4: SMT' BHAGYASREE' The Court made the following: REDDY SRI JUSTICE A'ABIIISHEK THE HON'BLE f N No. 2 3046o 2020 WRIT PETITIO OADER: the petitioner, the learned for Heard the learned counsel and Urban Administration (l lor Mur-ricipal overnment Pleader (]rlvt:rnn're t-r t P1e :rc1er' l rl're Icarnccl respotlcletrl No ' Dt rrcloptnent [or 2 :rnc1 4' anci tllc lcartLccl St:rncling rcspotlclent Nos lir llevct.
lt-Lc iirr Wrrt With their consent, the Petition 3 CrruttscI 1br resPonclent No stage of admisslon ' is clisposed of al lhe lht-- in:rctlon ol is filecl clucslionillg This r. r'rit pelition rosp(rcl Ccrlillcalc'il-l issuil'rg the 'No Objectlon respondertt No 3 in made b1'' the lands in spite of lhc rcpresentations of thc subject petitioneron04. 03. 2O2Oand0506'2O2Orespectively'dul1' No 4 by respondcnt 06 2O'2O rssued letLer dated O I considering the of ol NOC ir-r lavour addressed to responclent No 3 seeking issuance illegal and arbitrary' the petrlioner, ars that lhe for lhe: petitioner states Thc learned counsel O5 O(r'2020 to 04 O3 202O pclilroncr madc represenlations on 'rnd no ortlers o1'NOC' tlorltvct No :l scektng issrtatlcc thc rcsllondttlt llencc' I'tc sceks a clircclron to till date irrc- passecl lhereon r' ,.. 71 t111 1' p1' stlll'lll'lIr-'lr' ll' liti''r'' 1. ,,:. 1)uncl( l'rl \r.
' t,,111s1'rs' al lhe earliest instrLlcl iolls states lh'lt '1'he (iovernlnent Pleacicr' or-l Leralrnecl adrnrnis[t'rLi' and variolls pandemic situatron ' clue to Covicl-19 bv the pctrrioncr could representations submittecl cxigencies, the somc t ime lbr passing necessarli of and seeks not be clisposecl orders on the said represenl-aLions' Irt vieu' ol the above made submissions, petrtion the Wrrt is disposcd of directing the 3'ci respondent to dispose of the rcpresentations submitted b1, the petitioner on 04. 03. 2O20 and 05. 06. 2020 and pass necessary orders thereon, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditrously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. A copy of the order passed by the respondent No. 3 shall be communicated to the petitioner. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. K.
AMMAJI REG IST ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, of Telangana' Secretariat 1. The Principle Secretary' Revenue Department' State p#r "' t)"3 :'I :tB a J lflrlxi ff i Ba ].? ,fi[rffi i ? [ F FILi. $';:f *lg " p. jajrijriti District peddapali (Karimanagar) ikarimnag_ar) r, tr'4andal' Ramasunoan Ramigunoam 4 il;iJh. iid'ai ,'arv3. :r:m"t,;qLryAt$ffi :fl f,i:#llo"no". ",. omen,Hsh or reransana roUrl ror the state ,Jr"3J3,-ifry;5;Slf'fi . ? $[tBa1f 9. Two CD CoPies' PM\ HIGH COURT DATED:2311212020 lti 1 Hz s? A o 2021 o 0 6 JAN c) * /-c ORDER WP. No. 23046 of 2020 WP Disposing of the Without costs.
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.