SONU v. HRTC AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-11-04. SONU v. HRTC AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3987 of 2020 Date of Decision: November 4 , 2020 Sonu ... Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & another ... Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE Per: Anoop Chitkara, Judge (oral) The petitioner, who is working as Piece Meal Worker in the trade of Motor Mechanic with Regional Manager, HRTC Unit Nagrota Bagwan, Distt. Kangra, HP, has come up before this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to convert his services on contract basis. In this regard the petitioner has already made representation dated 20. 6. 2020 (Annexure P-16) which is still pending before the authorities concerned. 2. Notice. Mr.
Vikas Rajput, Advocate, appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3. In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents. 4. Consequently, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent/authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner, dated 20. 6. 2020 (Annexure P- 16), in accordance with law, within three months. While deciding the petitioner’s representation, the respondent/ authorities shall also take into consideration the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWPOA No. 1517 of 2019, in case titled as Prem Singh vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & another, decided on 18. 12. 2019. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court again, in case he still feels aggrieved and dissatisfied with the outcome of the representation. Pending application(s), if any, are closed.
Copy dasti. (L. Narayana Swamy), Chief Justice. (Anoop Chitkara), Judge. November 4 , 2020 (PK)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.