AKALESH KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2025-05-01. AKALESH KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:CGHC:20086 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2661 of 2019 1 - Akalesh Kumar S/o Shri Dev Kran Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Kamraud, Post Chourel, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgah. , District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Giteshwari Patel D/o Shri Dev Karan Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Kamraud, Post Chourel, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh. , District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 3 - Vinay Kumar Sahu S/o Amar Singh Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Andhiyarkhop, Near Tank, Block Colony Arang, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Beejapur District- Beejapur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Beejapur, District- Beejapur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Beejapur, District- Beejapur, Chhattisgarh. , District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None present. For Respondents No. 1 to 4 : Ms. Mukta Tripathi, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. B. S. Rajput, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 01/05/2025 1. On previous date of hearing, none appeared for the petitioners nor represented through counsel.
Today also, despite repeated calls neither petitioners appeared nor represented by any counsel, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge amit Digitally signed AMIT by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY KUMAR Date: DUBEY 2025. 05. 0311:42:26 +0530
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.