P. Ravi, v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-02-04. P. Ravi, v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
[ ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 25914 OF 2016 Between: P. Ravi, S/o. Chinna Komuraiah, Aged 33 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. Vanamala Kanparthi Village, Hanumakonda lvlandal, Warangal District. ... PETITIONER AND n '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Planning (lX) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector/Chief Planning Officer, Warangal, Warangal District. 3. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, lVlandala Praja Parishad, Hanumakonda Mandal' warangal District ... RES'.
NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the admitted bills to the petitioner in respect. of the works executed by the petitioner mentioned at Sl. No. 1 in the sanctioned proceedings Rc. No. 405/5DFlCP0l2013-14, dated 18-122013 ol the 2nd respondent, with interest @ 9% without reference to the Memo No. 13/Plg. Xl/SDF12014, dated 25-06-2014 issued by the 1st respondent and declare the action of the respondents in not making payments to the petitioner of admitted bills in respect of other similarly situated contractors as illegal and violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP.
NO: 32028OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to forthwith release the admitted bills of the petitioner for the work executed by the petitioner mentioned at Sl. No. 1 in the sanction proceedings Rc. No. 405/SDBlCPOl2013-14, dated . 18-12-2013 of the 2nd respondent, with interest @ 9% without reference to the Memo No. 13/Plg. XI/SDF12014, dated 25- 06-2014 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRI G. NARENDER R'EDDY, SC FOR MPPZPP The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITIONNo.
259L4 of 2OL6 ORDER: Petitioner executed certain works under a Contractual Agreement with the 3'd respondent-Mandal Parishad Warangal District' Development OIIicer, Hanumakonda Mandal, undertheSpecialDevelopmentFund. Itishisgrievancethatthe been paid bills related to the completed works have not admitted to him. Hence the present writ petition' I ,1 2. This Court on 05. 08. 2016 while admitting the writ petition granted interim order in W. P. M. P. No. 32O28 of 2016, which reads as follows: "Pending disposal of the writ petition, as the petitioner claims that the amounts due are under admitted bills, there shall be a direction to the respondent authorities to verify and quantify the amounts due to the petitioner in terms of the amounts, if any, shall be paid to the petitioner within four weeks from the date of receipt of a coPY of this order. " 3. No representation on behalf of the petitioner' 4. l,earned Government Pleader for Finance and Planning representing respondent Nos.
1 and 2 submits that respondent- bills for the works executed by the authorities paid the admitted 2 petitioner and therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not surrrive for adj udication. 5 Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/-S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO RAR \ //TRUE COPY// ^T[-r. ;; CER To 1. One CC to SRI K. SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC I 2. Two CCs to GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING, H igh Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI G. NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR MPPZPP [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies PSK. GJP fln- HIGH COURT DATED:0410212025 ORDER WP. No. 25914 o12016 t 1 HE STA T A- z . J 23 APn ilm o .. t t OF. :''FrA-CH DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS {+ . ) t^ f 1t
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.