Skip to main content
LawSphereX

RAM BALI MANJHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-16. RAM BALI MANJHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4958 of 2020 --------- 1. Ram Bali Manjhi 2. Kartik Manjhi 3. Karam Chand Manjhi 4. Vikas Kisku @ Bikash Kisku 5. Ganesh Manjhi 6. Ajay Kisku 7. Akash kisku @ Akash Kumar Kisku 8. Khirodhar Manjhi @ Khirodhar Kisku ... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party --------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A. P. P. --------- 02/16. 12. 2020 Defect no. 9(i) as pointed out by the office is ignored. Heard Mr. Satish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Saket Kumar, learned A. P. P. for the State. The petitioners have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail, as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Petarwar P. S. Case No. 103 of 2020 corresponding to G. R. No. 749 of 2020. It has been alleged that the informant and his family members were assaulted by the accused persons.

They had also outraged the modesty of the sister and aunt of the informant. All the allegations appear to be general and omnibus in nature. The petitioners claim that there was a land dispute existing between the parties which has led to their implication. On consideration of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on such surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S. D. J. M. , Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Petarwar P. S. Case No. 103 of 2020 corresponding to G. R. No. 749 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This application stands allowed.

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J. ) Umesh/-

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.