Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Gaddam Badami Ashitha v. Gaddam Thirupathi Reddy

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: RENUKA YARA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-22. Gaddam Badami Ashitha v. Gaddam Thirupathi Reddy. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO: 40O OF 20 Between: Gaddam Badami Ashitha, Wo. Gaddam Thirupathi Reddy, Aged 35 years, Occ. @ Private Employee, Rl/o. H. No. 5-43, Akber Nagar, Kundanpalli, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapally District. ... PETITIONER AND, Gaddam Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. Shankar Reddy, Aged 40 years, Occ. Agriculture,R/o. H. No. 3-61, Vittalapur Village of Chinnakodur Mandal, Siddipet District. ... RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C. P. C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to pass appropriate orders for withdrawing the HMOP No. 11412O25 pending on the file of the Learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Siddipet by transferring the same to the Court of the Learned Addl.

Senior Civil Judge at Godavarikhani in Peddapalli District lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in HMOP No. 11412025 on the file of Learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Siddipet, filed by the Respondent against the Petitloner, a including appearance of the Petitioner before the Learned Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet. Counsel for the-P-etitioner: SRl. RAMACHANDAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELATiIGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HIONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUI(A YARA Tr. C. M. P. No. 4OO of 2o25 Date: 22. L2. 2O25 Between: Gaddam Eiadami Ashitha @ .. Petitioner and Gaddam Thi:rupathi Reddy ... Respondent ORDER Heard Mr. Ramchander Rao Vemuganti, learned counsel for the petitione'r.

In spite of service of n<ltice, none appeared and there is no representation for the respondent. Perused the entire record I 2. This potition is filed by the petitioner seeking transfer of ) t H. M. O. P. No. 114 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned l Additional Senior Civil Judge at Siddipet, to the learned Additional Senior Civil . ludge at Godavarikhani in Peddapalli District. 3. Since there are catena of judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court to ccnsider the conveniencc of wife while transferring I \ t l\ matters arising out of matrimonial disputes, keeping in view of the of petitioner herein, convenience the the relief prayed for is granted. result, the 4. In the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is and the H. M. o. P. No. 114 of allowed 2025 pending on the file of the Additional Senior Civil learned Judge at Siddipet is withdrawn and to the learned Additional transferred senior civil Judge at in Peddapalli Godavarikhani District.

The entire original record shall be transmitted within a period of one month. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this'petition, shall stand closed. SD/. M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, a I 1. The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Siddipet 2. The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Godavarikhani in Peddapalli District. 3. one cc to'=sRl. RAMACHANDAR RAo VEMUGANTI Advocate topucl 4. Two CD CoPies kul/PSL a' -v{- '-'\ .. HIGH COURT DATED:2211212025 r( \{E SIA a-l rJ 2u6 rJ 2 [ IAt{ I +. * ORDER TRCMP. No. 40r) of 2025 i ALLOWING T]{E TR. CM. P. WITHOUT CO;STS l* LTIr

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.