TENGRIK M. SANGMA v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. BHATTACHARJEE
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2025-08-12. TENGRIK M. SANGMA v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 06 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M. C. No. 57 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12. 08. 2025 Shri. Tengrik M. Sangma Aged about 25 years S/o. Samuel M. Marak, R/o. Sategre, P. O. & P. S. – Dadenggre, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya. … Appellant(s)/Applicant(s) -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by the Secretary Home Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. Shri. Mallen Marak, Son of Sri Riksin Sangma, R/o. Chigitchakgre, P. O. & P. S. - Dadenggre, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya. … Opp. Party/Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. R. Pahsyntiew, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Gurung, GA for R 1. Mr. S. A. Sheikh, Adv. for R 2. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: Per. H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge: (ORAL) 1. Mr. S. A.
Sheikh, learned counsel has entered appearance today on behalf of the respondent No. 2, as such, service is complete. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 70 days in filing the Appeal against the impugned Judgment dated 19-02-2025 and Order of Sentence dated 20. 02. 2025, passed by the learned Special Judge, (POCSO), West Garo Hills District, Tura in Special POCSO Case No. 40 of 2021, whereby the applicant/appellant has been convicted under Section-6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, sentenced to undergo 20(Twenty) years of rigorous imprisonment, accompanied with a fine. 3. We have perused the application for condonation, and we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out in explaining the delay. 4. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. S. A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, also has no objection to the condonation, as prayed. 5. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the delay of 70 days, is condoned.
Registry to diarize and register the Appeal. 6. Misc. Case stands disposed of. (B. Bhattacharjee) (H. S. Thangkhiew) JUDGE JUDGE
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.