Smt. K. A. Lakshmi Kumari v. M/s Bank of Baroda
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-31. Smt. K. A. Lakshmi Kumari v. M/s Bank of Baroda. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A,RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN wRtr PET|TIoN NO. 16700 0F 2020 Between: Smt, K. A. Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 lr/is. Bank of Baroda, (erstwhile Vijaya Bank) Regional Office Stressed Asset Recovery Branch, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, #6-1-84/13, I Floor, Khusru Jung House, Secretariat Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 J. B. Chenna Reddy, S/o. J. Kesava Reddy, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Business, R/o. 201103, Gandhar Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the pleased circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of I\,4andamus, by declaring the action of the Respondents especially the Respondent No. 1 and his officials in interfering illegally and trying to dispossess the petitioner with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the premises in which a Fair Price Shop situated at H. No. A-32-102612195, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of the securitization and Reconstruction of financial Assets and enforcement of Security lnterest Acl, 2002 and the Rules made there under and also violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lnd ia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in_ the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 1 not to dispossess the Petitioner from the schedule property i. e. , the Fair Price Shop situated at H. No. 4-32-102612199, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District, without following the due procedure of law and pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Betwee n: Bank of Baroda, Regional Office Stressed Asset Recovery Branch, Rep. by its Authorized Officer, # 6-1-84113, I Floor, Khusru Jung House, Secretariat Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONERYRESP NO. 1 AND 1. lt4rs. K. A. Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. IVr. K. Hanumantha Rao, aged about 39 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 4-32-102612135A, Tulasi Nagar, Allwyn Cbtony, Kukatpa lly, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENT/PETITIONER 2. J. B. Chenna Reddy, Aged about43 years, Occ: Business, R/o.
20/103, Gandhar Sahara Estate, Mansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt. 08. 10. 2020 in l. A. No. '112020. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GOTURU KRISHNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI SRINIVAS CHITTURU Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN Writ Petition No. 16700 of 2020 ORDER: (Per Sri Justice A. Raiasheker Reddv) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition as the matter has been settled out of the Court and no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn lnterim order granted by this Court on 08. 10. 2020 shall stand vacated.
No order as to costs. IVliscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand dismissed. RAO SD/. N. GHANDRA SEKHAR ASSISTANT BEGI9-TRAR KL/' /iTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Rao, Advocate-[OPUC] 1. One CC to Sri Goturu Krishna z'. 6l"e CC io Sri Srinivas Chitturu, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD CoPies. N/P O' HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212020 1 He s 14 { ( ORDER o ,J 0 6 JA I'l 2021 z a WP. No. 16700 ot 2020 * * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.