Smt. Kulla Kasturi Bai v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-10. Smt. Kulla Kasturi Bai v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3302 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 37842 OF 2025 Between: 1. Smt. Kulla Kasturi Bai, fuo. Kulla Ravi Kumar, Aged. 57 Yrs. , Occ. Housewife, R/o. Plot No. 101/2, Ravi Colony, Near Bus Stop, Mahindra Hills, Secunderabad. 2. Kulla Ravi Kumar, S/o. Kulla Ramachandraiah, Aged. 62 Yrs. , Occ. Retired, Plot No. 10112,Ravi Colony, Near Bus Stbp, Mahindra Hills, Secunderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Stamps and Registration, Govemment of Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The District Registrar, Red Hills, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 4. The Sub Registrar, Bowenpally, Secunderabad. ...
RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus in declaring the action of the Respondent No. 4 in not receiving and registering the Settlement Deed presented by the Petitioners over all that the Residential Plot No. 101/2, (SCB No. 5-20-264) admeasuring 157. 4 Sq. Yards having builtup area total 1600 Sft. (Ground Floor 800 Sft. , First Floor 800 Sft. ) in Sy. No. 7413 situated at East Marredpally, Secunderabad. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 to receive and register the Settlement Deed over all that the Residential Plot No. 101/2, (SCB No. 5-20-264) admeasuring 157. 4 Sq.
Yards having builtup area total 1600 Sft. (Ground Floor 800 Sft. , First Floor 800 Sft. ) in Sy. No. 7413 situated at East Marredpally, Secunderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI JAKKULA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. S. SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER OF FOR THE STATE COURT IN THE HIGH AT IIYDERABAD K'SARATH SRT JUSTICE THE IIONOURABLE LO'L2'2O25 Date: Between: Bai & another' Kulla Kasturi Smt. . Petitloner AI{D by its Principal of Telan garla'Rep' The State Secretariat' Department' Revenue Secretary, & three others' Hyderabad ... ResPondents ORDER: for the counsel learned Sridhar' Heard Sri Jakkula petitioners,Smt. s. Sravanthi,learnedAssistantGovernment PleaderforStampsandRegistrationappearingfortherespondents andperusedthematerialonrecord. withtheirconsent,thisWrit of at the stage admission itself' Petition is disposed of of the petitioners that the Respondent 2. It is the case No.
4innotreceivingandregisteringtheSettlementDeed presented'bythepetitionersinrespectoftheResidentialPlot No. 101/2,(SCBNo. 5-20-264|ad. measuring|57. 4Sq. Yards Sq' 1600 Sq. feet (Ground Floor 8OO feet having buitt up area total i ! I 2 and First Floor Boo sq. feet) in sy. No. 74l3 ltzfarredpaJly' situated at secunderabad, East and also stated Governrnent that the is claiming state the subject properV in LGC as Government No. I 6Z of land, DgZ. Aggrieved by the action Authority of the Registering in not registering the subject --' docun qvuLlment, petifion the present is filed. writ g. Learned Counsel firr the petitioners further submits the issue involved that in this matter is connected with W. p. No. l9I06 of 2010' which is fired by the state Government against the in LGc'No'167 order 0f '7997 passed by the special court under the A. p. Land Grabbing (prohibition) Act, Tgg2,Hyderabad and the same was dismissed by the Division Bench of this court on 2g. o5 . 2025.
Therefore' learned counsel requested to a,Iow the writ petition by directing the respondent No. 4 to register the document presented by the petitioners. 4' on the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for stamps and Registration has not disputed the submission made by the rearned counser for the petitioners. 5' In view of the submissions made by both sides and in view of dismissal of the w. P. No. 19t06 of 2oto on 28. 05. 2025, the WritPetitionisdisposedofdirectingtherespondentNo. 4-Srrl: , iegistrartoregisterandreleasethedocumentpresentedbvth3 ir ii \ il \. - \ \l \ ---4' t petitioners in respect of subject property without reference to LGC No. 167 of 7992, subject to the petitioners comp\dng with the provisions of the Indian Registration Act, 190g, and Indian Stamps Act, 1899. It is also open to the Registering Authority to refuse the document presented by the petitioners, if any other objection and communicate the same to the petitioners. 6.
It is made clear that mere registration of the document does not confer title on the subject property and it is also made clear that this order would not have any bearing on aII those matters where title/rights of the parties a:are pending before the authorities either in revisi. ,,,r^__-:*:''" sion/appeals for adjudication and other in any case this orde t'"o does not preclude the parties assertipg in their rights ;t fore a competent cour:t of law. be no ? here order. " shall ,o "o",". , Miscellaneous )etitions' I if anv' pending in this writ petition, crosed. :1i1. :l1a DDY Io 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. PSK. GJP \z HIGH COURT DATED i1011212025 t ORDER r; i,r 1i-iE A ol 2025 -37842 WP. No 23DicM . t * ,'1.. - - r:. rrt:. -, . rdi) PETITION WRIT OF THE ING DISPOS c 10 v9
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.