BIJU.B v. THE BRANCH MANAGER
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-04-01. BIJU.B v. THE BRANCH MANAGER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
WP(C) No. 13174 of 2025 1 2025:KER:27628 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN ST TUESDAY, THE 1 DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 13174 OF 2025 PETITIONER: BIJU B. , AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. R. BHARGAVAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT MANDATHERIL THARAYIL, PUTHIYAVILA, PUTHIYAVILA. P. O, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA, PIN - 690531 BY ADVS. BINIYAMIN K. S. K. A. ANAS RESPONDENTS: 1 THE BRANCH MANAGER BANK OF BARODA, KAYAMKULAM BRANCH KOTTAKKATTU BUILDING, NEAR POST OFFICE, KAYAMKULAM, KERALA, PIN - 690502 2 THE REGIONAL MANAGER BANK OF BARODA, REGIONAL OFFICE, VASUDEV BUILDING, T. D. ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682011 3 THE GENERAL MANAGER BANK OF BARODA, HEAD OFFICE, BARODA HOUSE,MANDVI, BARODA, PIN - 390001 WP(C) No. 13174 of 2025 2 2025:KER:27628 4 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR, RBI REGIONAL OFFICE, BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682018 BY ADV. ANEESH K. M.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01. 04. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No. 13174 of 2025 3 2025:KER:27628 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Teacher by profession who availed a loan from the Bank of Baroda, Kayamkulam Branch. According to the petitioner, he has been paying monthly installments without fail. However, st the 1 respondent unilaterally extended the loan period without his consent and without any intimation. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner submitted Exts. P2 and P3 representations before respondents 1 and 3 respectively. The limited prayer st of the petitioner is for a direction to the 1 respondent to consider Ext. P2 expeditiously. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Aneesh K. M. , learned Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3. In the nature of the order I th propose to pass, notice to the 4 respondent is dispensed with. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case WP(C) No.
13174 of 2025 4 2025:KER:27628 and having regard to the submissions made across the st Bar, there will be a direction to the 1 respondent to consider Ext. P2 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, with notice to the petitioner, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE sp/01/04/2025 WP(C) No. 13174 of 2025 5 2025:KER:27628 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13174/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23. 09. 2010 Exhibit-P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20/05/2024 BEFORE THE MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, KAYAMKULAM BRANCH Exhibit-P3 A REPRESENTATION DATED 31/07/2024 BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, ERNAKULAM ZONE
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.