RAHUL KESHRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-18. RAHUL KESHRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10117 of 2020 Rahul Keshari … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pndey 2, Adv. For the State : Mr. V. K. Sinha, Addl. P. P. 02 /18. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over. In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bhandariya P. S. Case No. 43 of 2020 (S. T. No. 149 of 2020) registered under sections 376/323/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner established physical relationship with the victim on the promise of marriage but later on refused to marry her. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards Annexure-2 at page nos. 15-16 of the brief which is the certified copy of the petition filed by the victim , it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that therein she has stated that because of misconception, she has instituted F. I. R. against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03. 07. 2020 as mentioned in paragraph 11 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-IIIrd, Garhwa in connection with Bhandariya P. S. Case No. 43 of 2020 (S. T. No. 149 of 2020) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. Pappu/ (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. )
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.