Skip to main content
LawSphereX

HARI PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL v. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER II

Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. HARI PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL v. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER II. Read the judgment...

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 8520 of 2020 BETWEEN:- HARI PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, 85 SUNDER NAGAR EXTENSION, SUKHLIYA, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (SHRI PRATEEK PATWARDHAN, COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER). AND REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II, ADDRESS 7TH FLOOR IDA BUILDING 7, RACE COURSE ROAD, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENT (SHRI SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA, COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT). This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that vide order dated 17. 10. 2019 passed by the CGIT, Jabalpur, petitioner was directed to deposit 50% of the amount of Rs. 26,76,254/- i. e. Rs. 13,38,127/-. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 50% amount was deposited by the petitioner and the remaining was recovered from the petitioner.

The order of recovery was challenged before this Court in the present petition. However, in compliance of the interim order dated 25. 06. 2020 passed by this Court, the petitioner has deposited the outstanding 50% of the main amount. Therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous. However, Signature Not Verified Signed by: SREEVIDYA Signing time: 02-02- 2024 18:05:44 learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the conditional order granted by the CGIT for depositing of the 50% amount may be continued since the petitioner has already deposited the remaining amount in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 25. 06. 2020. 3. This factual position has not be disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. 4. In view of the aforesaid factual position, the interim order passed by the CGIT, Jabalpur vide order dated 17. 10. 2019 in CGIT/LC/EPFA/52/2019 shall continue unless the same is vacated by the CGIT. 5.

With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (S. A. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE vidya Signature Not Verified Signed by: SREEVIDYA Signing time: 02-02- 2024 18:05:44

Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.