Thallapelli Prem Kumar v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-24. Thallapelli Prem Kumar v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3303 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PET|TION NO: 17575 OF 2025 Between: 1. Thallapelli Prem Kumar, S/o Narsaiah, Aged about 2Syears, Occ- Student, R/o Kinagarthi Village, Odela Mandal, Peddapalli District. 2. Thallapelli Rajeshwari, W/o Narsaiah, Aged about 51years, Occ- Housewife, R/o Kanagarthi Village, Odela Mandal, Peddapalli District, 3. Thallapelli Narsaiah, S/o Ramaiah, Aged abor. rt 66years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o Kanagarthi Village, Odela Mandal, Peddapalli District. ... Petitioner/Accused No. 1 to 3 AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2. Barkam Gayathri, D/o Nagesh, Aged about 24yrs, Occ- Student' R/o H. No. 1B-. 439t1 and i8-383,18-435, LIC Colony, Mancherial Town and District. ...
Respondenude-facto complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 3 in I S. C. No. 116 of 2025 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mancherial. l. A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioners/Accused No. '1 to 3 in S. C. No. 116 of 2025 on the file of the Principal District and Ser;sions Judge. Mancherial.
This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crixinal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri ByRApAKA ANAND KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jlthender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1, and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER a SIN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17575 of 2O25 Drte:24. L2. 2O25 Between: Thallapelli Prem Kumar and two others ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad and another. . .. Respondents ORDER This Criminal Petition is hled seeking to quash the proceedings in S. C. No. 116 of 2025, on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mancherial, wherein the petitioners were a-rrayed as accused Nos.
l to 3, for the offences punishable under Sections 78 and 351 (2) r/w. 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Heard Smt. P. Sumalatha, learned counsel representing Mr. Byrapaka Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1-State. \55 -- I 3. Though the criminal p"tiiion was filed seeking to quash the proceedings in S. C. No. 116 of 2025, the learned counsel for the petitioners restricted her prayer requesting this Court to dispense with the appearance of the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 3 in S. C. No. tfO of 2025, on the hle of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Malcherial. 4. The learned Additional public prosecutor has not oppos. ed the submission made by the learned counsel for petitic,ners. 5. Io view of the above submissions, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the presence of the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 3 in S. C. No.
Ll6 of 2025, on the file of the learned principal District and Sessions Judge, Mancherial, is dispensed with, subject to the condition that thty shall be represented through their counsel on each and every date of hearing. If the presence of the petitioners is required, they shall appear before the trial Court. In case of his non-appearance on the specihc date hxed by the trial Court fc r their appearance, the trial Court is entitled to proceed rrith the matter, in accordance with law. t 6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. K BHAVANI SWAMY I ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S TION OFFICER To, 1. The 2nd Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Mancherial' 2. TheStationHouseofiicer,Mancheria|Policestation'MancherialDistrict. Telangana at High Court for the State of 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad [OUT] KUMAR, Advocate IOPUC] 4. One CC to SRI BYRAPAKA ANAND 5.
Two CD CoPies NVB/ABK Itg HIGH COURT DATED:24t1212025 -- -t- o J Atl 2[26 ? 3 ORDER i. * CRLP. No. 17575 ot 2025 DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION (6)_-5-<s a/t fz-a
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.