SUNITA MUNDA v. THE RANCHI UNIVERSITY
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-16. SUNITA MUNDA v. THE RANCHI UNIVERSITY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3528 of 2020 1. Sunita Munda 2. Anup Kumar Sahu 3. Laxmi Kumari 4. Jayanti Kachhap 5. Manisha Kujur 6. Alka Kumari ... … Petitioners Versus 1. The Ranchi University, Ranchi 2. The Controller of Examination, Ranchi University, Ranchi 3. The Principal, Bharati College of Education, Village Kandri, PO & PS- Mandar, District-Ranchi … …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner :- Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent :- Mr. Anoop Kumar Mahato, Advocate Order No. 03 Dated: 16. 12. 2020 The present case is taken up through video conferencing. 2. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking following reliefs: (i) For quashing the letters of punishment dated 06. 10. 2020 and 08. 10. 2020 issued by the respondent no. 3 whereby the admission of the petitioners has been cancelled. (ii) For issuance of direction upon the respondent nos.
1 st and 2 to allow the petitioners to fill up the forms of 1 Year B. Ed. Examination conducted by the Ranchi University, scheduled to be held between 03. 10. 2020 to 17. 10. 2020 as due to fault of the respondent no. 3, the petitioners could not be able to fill up the forms. (iii) For issuance of direction upon the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to transfer the candidature of the petitioners from Bharti College of Education to another B. Ed. College due to the dispute arose between the students and management of the said college regarding realization of fees and other charges. (iv) For issuance of direction upon the respondents to return the original educational certificates which were seized by the management of the respondent no. 3. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners st have not been allowed to fill up the forms for 1 year B. Ed. examination by the respondent no. 3. Some disputes arose between the petitioners and the respondent no.
3 which, however, was subsequently resolved on 12. 10. 2020. A copy of the terms of arrangement agreed upon by the parties has been annexed as Annexure-9/A to the present writ petition. The grievance of the petitioners is that despite the fact that the dispute between the petitioners and the respondent no. 3 got amicably settled, they are not st being allowed to fill up the forms so as to enable them to appear in 1 year B. Ed. examination. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on st instruction, submits that the 1 year B. Ed. examination is yet to be conducted by the respondent- Ranchi University. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and keeping in view the nature of the prayer made in the writ petition, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioners are given liberty to prefer representation(s) on the present issue before the respondent no. 2- the Controller of Examination, Ranchi University, Ranchi.
On receipt of the said representation, the respondent no. 2, after calling upon the representative of Bharati College of Education, Kandri, Mandar, District- Ranchi and on providing opportunity of hearing to both the sides, will try to amiably resolve the issue within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the said representation. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty and observation. (Rajesh Shankar, J. ) Ritesh/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.