SYIEM RAID MARNGAR AND DORBAR MYLLIEM SYIEMSHIP v. THE KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 5 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2025-04-16. SYIEM RAID MARNGAR AND DORBAR MYLLIEM SYIEMSHIP v. THE KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 5 ORS....
Judgment text
Serial No. 05 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC (WPC) No. 63 of 2025in WP(C) No. 42 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16. 04. 2025 Syiem Raid Marngar and Dorbar Mylliem Syiemship, Ri-Bhoi District …Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus 1. The Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council Represented by its Secretary, Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 2. The Chief Executive Member, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong-793002 East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya 3. The Deputy Chief Executive Member, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong-793002 East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya 4. The Executive Member (EM) in-charge Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong-793002 East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya 5. Joint Action Committee, San Shnong Hima Mylliem, Ri-Bhoi District, represented by its Secretary Shri L. Wahlang 6. Syiem of Hima Mylliem, Mylliem Syiemship …. Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S.
Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s): Mr. T. Dkhar, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. T. T. Diengdoh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. C. C. T. Sangma, Adv. (For R 1-4) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: (ORAL) 1. This is an application for renewal of the interim order dated 20. 02. 2025, passed by this Court in MC (WPC) No. 23 of 2025 arising out WP(C) No. 42 of 2025. 2. It is submitted by Mr. T. Dkhar, learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant that this Court on being satisfied that a prima facie case existed in favour of the writ petitioner, had by the order dated 20. 02. 2025, passed an interim order keeping the impugned order dated 21. 01. 2015, suspended until the next date. However, he submits due to inadvertence, he could not be present on the last date, which has resulted in the said interim order lapsing.
He therefore, prays for the ends of justice, the interim order be revived, and the matter be taken up for consideration. 3. Mr. T. T. Diengdoh, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. C. C. T. Sangma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents Nos. 1 to 4, has submitted that the issues involved are very limited and if the private respondents were present, perhaps the matter could have been disposed of. 4. However, on perusal of the office note, it is indicated that service is yet to be completed, on the respondent No. 5. 5. Accordingly, this Misc. Case stands disposed of by allowing the interim order to continue till the next date, when the main case is fixed. JUDGE Meghalaya 16. 04. 2025 “V. Lyndem-PS” Signature Not Verified Page 3 of 3 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2025. 04. 16 19:32:12 IST
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.