SREE NAGARJUNA CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. Sri. RAVINDER REDDY
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SUJANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-26. SREE NAGARJUNA CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. Sri. RAVINDER REDDY. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT I THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. I SUJANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1871 OF 20'l 9 Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order and Decree made in 1A. No. 1235 of 2018 in C M. A. No. 114 of 2018 dated 12. 03. 2019 on the file of the Xl Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. Between: Sree Nagarjuna Co-op. Housing Society Ltd , (Regn. No. T48-96), Plot No. 4'1 , Nagarjuna Hills, Panjagutta, Hyderabad - 500 082 Rep. by its President DT. KVLN Raju, Sio. Late Sri. K. N. Raju, aged about 61 years, R/o. 56, Nagarjuna Hills, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONERYRESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF AND Ravinder Reddy, S/o. Late Sri S. Narayan Reddy, aged about 55 years, Villa 9ri- R/o. No. 21, Aparna Palm lVleadows, Gundlapochampally, Kbmpally, Hyd6rabad. Also at H. No. 8-2-231115 and 16, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. ...
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT I |. A. NO: 1 OF 2019 I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Stay Order dated 12th March, 20'19 passed in l. A. No. 1235 oI 2018 in C. M. A. No. 114 of 20'18 on the file of the Honourable Xl Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad pending disposal of the revision petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. K. RAJENDRAN Counsel for the Respondent : -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SU. JANA CML REVISION PETITION No. 1871 of 2O19 I I ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition has been frled against the orders passed in the interlocutory application pending the suit. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
lt is brought to the notice of this Court that the main suit itself has been disposed and therefore, the cause in the revision petition has become infructuous. Rccording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 'lhere shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/. T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTA T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' CTION OFFICER \ To, '1 . The Xl Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri K. Rajendran , Advocate (OPUC) 3. Two CD Copies Ks/gh o HIGH COURT DATED:2611212024 1 t{ S 14 r(' (L ) u 1 1 F tB 216 o ORDER . \ I t t . SP^17 UH C. R. P. No. 1871 ot 2019 Dismissing the C. R. P as lnfructuous. Without costs. OI
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.