SANDEEP DEUBEY v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. SANDEEP DEUBEY v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 21181 of 2019 BETWEEN:- SANDEEP DEUBEY S/O SHRI PHOOL CHAND DUBEY OCCUPATION: AS COMPUTER OPERATOR JANPAD PANCHYAT BUDNI, DISTRICT SIHORE R/O GOVERNMENT QUARTER NO. 2, JANPAD COMPUND, JANPAD OFFICE, BUDNI, DISTRICT SIHORE, M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI ANURAG SHIVHARE - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. STATE OF M. P. THROUGH JOINT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF PANCHAYAT RAJ NEAR P. F OFFICER ARERA HILLS (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILA PANCHAYAT DISTT. SEHROE (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER JANPAD PANCHAYAT BUDNI DISTT. SEHROE (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. COLLECTOR SEHORE DISTT. SEHROE (MADHYA PRADESH) .....
RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI LALIT JOGLEKAR - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Signature Not Verified Signed by: PANKAJ NAGLE Signing time: 2/3/2024 12:14:44 PM Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India making a prayer for issuing of writ/order to the respondents to regularize the petitioner on vacant post of Computer Operator. 2. It is submitted by counsel appearing for petitioner that representation of petitioner is pending since 2019 and same has not been decided. 3. Learned Government Advocate for the State submitted that if fresh representation is preferred along with documents supporting his claim then same will be decided by the Competent Authority i. e. respondent No. 3 in accordance with law. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts, petition is disposed off directing respondent No.
3 to consider and decided the representation of petitioner by passing reasonable and speaking order within a period of 120 days from receipt of fresh representation along with documents. 5. Fresh representation will be filed within a period of 15 days before the respondent No3. 6. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE pn Signature Not Verified Signed by: PANKAJ NAGLE Signing time: 2/3/2024 12:14:44 PM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.