MD SAFRUDDIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-17. MD SAFRUDDIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 2377 of 2024 ---------- 1. Md. Safruddin aged about 65 years s/o-Late Abdul Hamid resident of Village-English Post-Fudkipur P/S-Radhanagar, Dist. -Sahibganj, Jharkhand 2. Md. Aftabuddin aged about 71 years resident of Village-Juhibona, Post- Agloi, P. S. -Barharwa, Dist. -Sahibganj, Jharkhand ………… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary Schooli Shiksha and Literacy Department of Education P. O. & P. S. -Dhurwa, Dist. -Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. The Director Primary Education Directorate of primary education Government of Jharkhand having its office at Dhurwa P. O. & P. S. -Dhurwa, Dist. -Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education Santhal Pargana Pramandal, Dumka, P. O. +P. S. & Dist. -Dumka, Jharkhand 5. The Deputy Commissioner Sahibganj cum-Chairman of District Education Establishment Committee, Sahibganj P. O. + P. S. & Dist. -Sahibganj, Jharkhand 6. The District Education Officer Sahibganj, P.
O. + P. S. & Dist. -Sahibganj, Jharkhand 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Sahibganj, P. O. + P. S. & Dist. - Sahibganj, Jharkhand ………… Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK For the Petitioners : Mr. Din Dayal Saha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sushant Kumar, AC to SC-II ---------- 04/ 17. 12. 2024 Heard the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that suffice it would be if a direction is given to the petitioners to file fresh representation for redressal of their grievances and thereupon, respondents may be directed to pass reasoned order on their representation within a stipulated period of time. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents very fairly submits that if this Court directs the petitioners to file fresh representation before the respondent-authorities, the respondents shall pass reasoned order on the same. 4.
In view of fair submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I hereby direct the petitioners to file fresh representation annexing all the relevant documents on which they are relying, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and after receiving the same alongwith the copy of this order, the respondents shall consider the grievances in accordance with law, taking into consideration the prevalent rules, guidelines and legal propositions as well as Annexures-6, 7 and 8 to the writ petition and thereafter pass a speaking and reasoned order within a further period of six weeks which shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 5. It goes without saying that if the petitioners are found entitled for the benefits as prayed for, the same may be extended to them within a further period of two weeks. 6. With these observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S. N. Pathak, J. ) Rohit/-
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.