DASSAULT SYSTEMES SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION & ANR. v. MR. YOGESH RAJPUT & ANR.
Court: High Court of Delhi
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Delhi judgment dated 2025-10-27. DASSAULT SYSTEMES SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION & ANR. v. MR. YOGESH RAJPUT & ANR. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 513/2025 & I. A. 13402/2025 DASSAULT SYSTEMES SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Shantanu Sahay, Ms. Manvi Panwar & Ms. Vareesha Irfan, Advocates. versus MR. YOGESH RAJPUT & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shrey Patnaik, Ms. Saira Khan, Mr. Anmol Bakshi, Mr. Kush Taneja, Mr. Pratyush Arora, Advocates for D- 1 and D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 27. 10. 2025 1. Mr. Rishi Raj, the factory head of defendant nos. 1 and 2 has joined the proceedings through VC link. He states that currently the defendant holds three perpetual licenses for the plaintiff’s software. 2. He states that in case defendant requires any additional license from the plaintiff, it will approach the plaintiff directly and it understands that it cannot use any software without first seeking the license from the plaintiff. 3.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that in view of the Local Commissioner’s report dated 02. 06. 2025 and the submissions made by the defendant today, the suit can be disposed of. 4. This Court takes note that the Local Commissioner in the report has stated that during execution of the local commission no pirated software was This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/10/2025 at 12:24:33 found installed. It records that only two systems had the software, which in view of the perpetual licenses held by the defendant were found not to be infringing. In view of the aforesaid report and the statement of the representatives of the defendants this court is satisfied that there is no cause of action for the plaintiff to pursue the suit. 5.
However, to safeguard the interests of the plaintiff, the statement of the defendant is taken on record; the defendant is held bound to the same and the suit is accordingly disposed of. 6. Pending application, if any, stand disposed of. 7. Future dates stand cancelled. 8. Interim order stands vacated. 9. The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official website of the Delhi High Court, www. delhihighcourt. nic. in, shall be treated as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J OCTOBER 27, 2025/mt This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/10/2025 at 12:24:33
Source: High Court of Delhi. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.