AJAY KUMAR AND ORS. v. S.K.SHARMA,GENERAL MAMAGER P.D.C.AND ORS
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-04-19. AJAY KUMAR AND ORS. v. S.K.SHARMA,GENERAL MAMAGER P.D.C.AND ORS. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Sr. No. 9 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPOWP No. 179/2015 in [OWP 299/2013] c/w OWP No. 299/2013 IA Nos. 1/2016, 1/2015, 807/2013, 388/2013 1. Ajay Kumar, Aged 39 years (Approx), …. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) S/o Sh. Krishan Chand R/o Village Chillhaar, Tehsil & District Jammu 2. Girdhari Lal, Aged 53 years (Approx), S/o Sh. Chet Ram, R/o Village Chillhaar, Tehsil & District Jammu Through :- Mr. J. P. Sharma, Advocate V/s 1. S. K. Sharma, General Manager, …. Respondent(s) Power Grid Corporation (India) Ltd. (Regional Zonal Officer North Zone), Rail Head Complex, Jammu 2. Mr. Ranjan Bhola, Asstt. General Manager/ General Manager, Power Grid Corporation (India) Ltd. At Kishanpur (Manwaal-Jindraah Area), Tehsil & District Jammu 3. Mr. P. S. Rawat, Senior Regional Officer, Tata Projects Limited, Regional Officer, Near Daak-Bunglow (Pittan-Bud), Udhampur 4.
Balwan Singh Sub-Contractor working as an Incharge of the Tata Projects Limited Regional Office Daak-Bunglow (Pittan-Bud), Udhampur site at Village Chirangal, Tehsil Jammu Through :- Ms. Sagira Jaffter, Assisting Counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Ms. Garima Gupta, Advocate HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 19. 04. 2024 CPOWP No. 179/2015 This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners against the respondents for non compliance of order dated 27. 06. 2013 passed by this Court in OWP No. 299/2013, whereby respondents were directed not to dispossess the 2 CPOWP No. 179/2015 petitioners from land in their occupation without adopting the due course of law and respondents were given liberty to proceed in case petitioners are in occupation of land in question. Statement of facts have been filed, contending therein that the grievance of the petitioners stands already redressed as due notification dated 03. 03.
2014 was issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1990 and meeting of the Private Negotiation Committee (PNC) also took place on 28. 05. 2014. In view of the statement of facts filed by learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, nothing survives to adjudicate in this contempt petition, the same is, accordingly, closed. Proceedings initiated against the respondents are dropped. OWP No. 299/2013 Ms. Monika Kohli, learned Sr. AAG shall file response disclosing the latest status of the notification dated 03. 03. 2014, issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1990. List on 03. 06. 2024. (Rajesh Sekhri) ) (Tashi Rabstan) Judge Judge Jammu: 19. 04. 2024 Pawan Angotra Whether the order is speaking? : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable? : Yes/No Pawan Angotra 2024. 04. 20 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.