Md. Liyakath Ali v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-11. Md. Liyakath Ali v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3168 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 65O4 OF 2020 Between: Md. Liyakath Ali, S/o Md. Shabbir Ali Petitioner/Accused AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. , by its Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2, Zareena Begum, D/o MA. Aziz, aged about 30 years, Occ: Private Teacher, R/o H. No, Shivaji Nagar, Khanapur, Nirmal District, (R2 is Impfeaded as per Court Order dated LtlL2/2O2O in IA. NO. 1 of 2O2O in CrlP. No. 6504/2O2O) Respondents/Complaina nt Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P,C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Statlon House Officer, Khanapur (Nirmal) Police Station, Nirmal District to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.
118/2020 of Khanapur (Nirmal) Police Station, Nirmal District, in the interest of justice. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI C SHARAN REDDY Advocate for the Petitioner and the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent No. 1, the Court made the following. ORDER: IIHE HON'BLE JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CI. RIMINAL PETITION No. 65O4 of 2 o20 ORDER: This application is filed seeking anticipatory bail. The petitioner is accused in Crime No. 118 of 20i9 of Khanapur (Nirmal) Police Station, Nirmal District. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section 42O lPC. Heard lr:arned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Pr:rused the record. The alle;3ations against the peiltioner herein are that he has deceived the d. e facto complatnant by promising that he would marry her.
11- is also alleged against the petitioner that he has taken amoun t from tlne d-e complainant and lured her /acto sexually. Sri C. SheLran Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thc de complainant is aware that the petitioner is facto a married marr and working as constable. She lived with him for some time. Even in the complaint dated 15. 1 1. 202O itself there is mention that zr:ter negotiations with the elders, the petitioner trnd the de co;::rplainant have stayed together in Sarangapur Police facto Station, after tr':e petitioner was attached to the said police station. I I t The abcve said facts would reveal that the de facto complainant k. :owing fully well that the petitioner is married man stayed with hLim for some time. It appears that there is no resistance frorn the de There are several facto complainant. aspects have to be investigated into by the Investigating Officer.
-/ z Considering the said aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is al1owed. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the Station House Ofl-rcer, Khanapur (Nirmal) Police Station, Nirmal District, within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioner on bail on his executing personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to his satisfaction. The petitioner sha1l report before the Station House Officer, Khanapur (Nirmal) Police Station, on every Sunday between 1O. O0 a. m. and 5. 00 p. m. till completion of investigation and Iiling of charge sheet. Further, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 438 (2\ Cr. P. C and shall co- operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed. N. cl-;ANDRAS :SDi- KI. IARA RAO r'. SSI RAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. 2. The Station House Officer,. f[algqur (Nirmat) potice Station, Nirmal 3. one cc to District sRt. c sHARAN_REDbV iJ;;l; I forr. f 4. rwo \ CCs pUBLtc to pRosECUToR,;;;A;. H;t ! rryr I vvur L Hyderabad. 5. One SPare [oUT] Copy HIGH COURI' KLJ DATED:1 111?. 12020 ,} {o "*$ ',/ l-! c rlX ORDER CRLP. No. 6504 of 2020 I BAIL
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.