RAGHUNANDAN PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-16. RAGHUNANDAN PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9924 of 2020 Raghunandan Pandey … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Bibhash Sinha , Adv. For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad , Addl. P. P. 02 / 16. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Giridih (T) P. S. case no. 128 of 2020 instituted under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 27 (b) (ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner supplied certain drugs and medicines without proper license and permission. It is then submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner is false.
It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no allegation against the petitioner that he has supplied spurious, adulterated or expired drugs and the medicines allegedly supplied by the petitioner included creams and lotions too. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 07. 07. 2020 as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application and the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Giridih in connection with Giridih (T) P. S. case no. 128 of 2020 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J. ) Smita/-
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.