Poreddy Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-07. Poreddy Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
I3168 | IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6,156 OF 2020 Between: l. Poreddy Venkat Reddy, S/o. Ram Narsimha Reddy, 2. Poreddy Sukanya, Wo. Venkat Reddy, Petitioners/Accused ANI) The State ofTelangana, through SHO, P. S. Hayathnagar, Rep. by Public Prosecutor for the Stare ofTelangana in the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. Respondent /Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P. C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the SHO, P. S. Hayathnagar, R. R. District to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their anest in crime No.
654 of2020 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana in the interest ofjustice; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Venkat Ram Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners, and ofthe Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following. ORDER: "This is an application for anticipatory bail, The petitioners herein are accused in Crime No. 654 of 2020 on the lile of Hayathnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. The offence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 354 IPC. 2. Heard Sri M. Venkat Ram Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the record, 3. In the complaint dated 30. 10. 2020, the de facto complainant alleged against the l't petitioner herein that he has assaulted her on the road and he has also caught hold of her hair.
It is also alleged by the rle laclo complainant that on the very same day, the wife of the 1'( petitioner herein who is the 2'd petitioner herein has abused the de facto complainant and her daughter at 5 a. m. Prima facie, it appears from the complaint dated 30. 10. 2020, the allegations are vague in nature. There are several aspects to be investigated into by the Investigating Officer. . 1. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions would submit that since the punishment for the offence alleged against the petitioners is imprisonment for 2 years, or fine, or both as per section 353 cr. P. c, the Investigating officer has already invoked the procedure laid down under Section 4l-A Cr. P. C, 5, Considering the said aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein. 6.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioners are grantetl anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions: (D The petitioners/accused are directed to surrender before the Hayathnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, within a period of tu,o (2) weeks from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioners on bail on their executing a personal bond each for a sum of Rs. I0,0001 (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each to the like sum each to his satisfaction. (ii) The l'r petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, on cvery Sunday between 10,00 AM and 5. 00 PM, till completion of investigation and filing of final report. (iii) The petitioners/accused shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. " Sd/- B. SATYAVATHI AssrsrANil2gR //TRUE COPY/I SECTION OFFICIIR To, I . The III Addl. District and Sessions Judge cum Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, L. B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. 2. The XXIV Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Hayathnagar. 3. The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTelangana, at Hyderabad (OPUC) 5. One CC to Sri M. Venkat Ram Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 6. one Spare copy HIGH COI]RT KT,,J DATE: 7-12-2020 ORD[R CRL. P. NO. 6456, OF 2020 t1j ilttm i -a, <:O 9ESpa:rctt PETITION ALL()WED
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.