LYNGDOH RAID NONGKHRAH AND 4 ORS. v. WANPHRANG SYIEM NONGSHAI AND 6 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-12-13. LYNGDOH RAID NONGKHRAH AND 4 ORS. v. WANPHRANG SYIEM NONGSHAI AND 6 ORS. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Serial No. 06 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)]. No. 215 of 2024 in WP(C). No. 452 of 2024 Date of Order : 13. 12. 2024 1. Lyngdoh Raid Nongkhrah Shri. La Lyngdoh Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 2. Lyngdoh Raid Nongkharai Shri. Moses Syngkli Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 3. Lyngdoh Raid Sohkhwai Shri. Speshon Sylliang Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 4. Lyngdoh Raid Nongkyrla Shri. Phrangsngi Syngkli Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 5. Lyngdoh Raid Nongpoh Shri. Linus Lyngdoh Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. …Applicants -Versus- 1. Shri. Wanphrang Syiem Nongshai S/o Kliderwell Syiem Nongshai Resident of Mawdiangum Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 2. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council Shillong through its Secretary to the Executive Committee, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong. 3. The Under Secretary to the Executive Committee, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong. 4. Shri. A.
Basaiawmoit, Administrative Officer cum Deputy Secretary to the Executive Committee, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong. 5. The Executive Member i/c Elaka Administration, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong. 6. Synjuk ki Nongsynshar Raid Nongpoh Sirdarship, Ri-Bhoi District represented by its Secretary, Shri. S. Maring. 7. Shri. S. Lyngdoh, Lyngdoh Raid Nonglyngdoh, Nongpoh Sirdarship, Ri-Bhoi District. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Sen, Adv. Ms. S. Shallam, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. L. Nongpiur, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. This is an application by the applicants named herein, for impleading themselves as party respondents in WP(C). No. 452 of 2024. 2. It is submitted by Mr. S.
Sen, learned counsel for the applicants, that they are absolutely necessary to be made respondents in view of the fact that the suspension of the petitioner was due to the complaints that have been filed by the applicants herein. 3. Mr. M. L. Nongpiur, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to file objection to the impleadment application. He has also submitted that they are not necessary in view of the fact that respondent No. 5, in the main writ petition also encompasses the applicants who seek impleadment. 4. Be that as it may, in the interest of justice, the applicants are hereby impleaded as respondents Nos. 7 to 11. Registry to make necessary corrections in the cause title. 5. Misc. case accordingly is allowed and stands disposed of. Judge Signature Not Verified 3 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2024. 12. 13 18:00:14 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.