Dr.R.Vidyadhar v. Archarya Nagarjuna University
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2025-03-26. Dr.R.Vidyadhar v. Archarya Nagarjuna University. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
APHC010499982018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3396] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 24152/2018 Between: Dr. R. Vidyadhar ... PETITIONER AND Archarya Nagarjuna University and Others ... RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K RAMAKANTH REDDY 2. M. CHALAPATHI SC For Nagarjuna University 3. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) 4. BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings No. RandJ/Estt / 2018/104 dated nd 9. 5.
2018 issued by the 2 respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, set aside the same nd and direct the 2 respondent to continue the services of the petitioner with all the service benefits including Sixth Pay Scales as per AICTE norms as adopted nd by 2 respondent at Rule 8(a) of its Service and Conduct Rules-1995. ” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I and learned Standing Counsel for respondent-University are in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* HON’BLE DR.
JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 24152 of 2018 26. 03. 2025 Mjl /*
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.