Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SUNNY K. KALLINKAL v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

Court: High Court of Kerala

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-29. SUNNY K. KALLINKAL v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P. CHALY TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 8TH POUSHA, 1942 WP(C). No. 29162 OF 2020(U) PETITIONER/S: SUNNY K. KALLINKAL AGED 67 YEARS S/O. KUNJUVAREETH, KALLINGAL HOUSE, CHALAKKUDY P. O, THRISSUR-680 307 BY ADV. SRI. N. D. DIPINGHOSH RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, PIN-680 003. 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKKUDA, CIVIL STATION, ANNEX, IRINGALAKKUDA, THRISSUR, PIN-680 125, KOCHI 682 001. 3 THE THAHASILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 733. 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER PARIYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 721. 5 THE CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, KRISHI BHAVAN PARIYARAM, THRISSUR PIN-680 721 GP SMT. VINITHA. B THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W. P. (C) No. 291162 of 2020 SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

=============================== W. P. (C) No. 29162 of 2020 =============================== th Dated this the 29 day of December, 2020 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the owner owner in possession of a property having an extend of 2. 43 Ares in Re- Sy. No. 854/2, 1. 81 Areas in Re-Survey NO. 845/2 and 1. 63 Areas in Re-Sy No. 845/1 of Pariyaram Village, Mukundapuram Taluk, Thrissur district. Apparently, the petitioner has submitted an application before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thrissur as per Section 27 A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 and which was dismissed as per Ext. P8 order and being aggrieved, petitioner has submitted Ext. P9 appeal before the District Collector, Thrissur, the first respondent. The sole relief sought for is, consideration of Ext. P9 2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader, this writ W. P. (C) No.

291162 of 2020 petition is disposed of with a direction to the to the first respondent to finalise Exhibit-P9, at the earliest and at any rate,within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if not physically by online. Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE rpk APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 08. 08. 2019 OF PARIYARAM VILLAGE. TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACTS OF THE LAND DATA BANK. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 15311/2018 DATED 08. 05. 2018. TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 27A BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17. 03. 2020. TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 17. 03. 2020. TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 03. 08. 2020. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 16949/2020 DATED 26. 08. 2020. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 14. 08. 2020. TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19.

11. 2020.

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.