Bathini Padmavathi v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-11-28. Bathini Padmavathi v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,. Read the...
Judgment text
t 3183 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 37035 OF 2015 Between: BathiniPadmavathi,Wo:Veeraiah,agedabout35yggrs'Fl/oKurmapally Hlo naginedu, Village, Peddapally Man<Jal, Karimnagar District' ... PETITIONER AND 't. The State of Telangana, Rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department Qy Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Superintendent of Police Karimnagar, Karimnagar District' District. 3. The Station House Officer Peddapalli Police Station, Karimnagar 4. Mr. JaganMohan,sub. lnspectorofPolice,PeddapalliPoliceStation, Karimnagar District. ...
RESPONDENTS of lndia praying that in the Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution High court may circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the be pleased to lssue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent No. 4 in not proceeding with the investigation into cr. No. 18512015 in collusion with the accused though the said crime is registered on 109-201 5, as being illegal' arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to entrust the matter to some other investigating agency duly adding Section 148' 452' 3O7 rtw 149 l. P. c. in cr. No. 185/2015, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon,bleCourtmaydeemsfitandproperinthecircumstancesofthecase. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2015 ("VPMP. NO:47689 0F 2015) Petition unde' section 1 5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit.
filed in r;upport of the petition, the High court may ber pleased to pass orders directing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein to give protection to the petitioner and her husband from the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for,the Petitioner: SRt N. HARI PRASAD (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER TIIE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 37035 OF 2015 ORDER:(ORAL) When the matter was taken up hearing on 21. 11. 2024, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 28. 11. 2024. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the case. 2 Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications' if any, i pending in this writ petition stand closed. l Sd/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRuE coPY// l',1'=-- -- SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . One CC to Sri N. Hari Prasad, Advocate [OPUC].. i. ifi"ct;id'ci 6, H;ft:"HisIi c"iil roi'tre state of relangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI 3. Two CD CoPies TJ MP YY HIGH COURT ( DATED:2811112024 (X r 'i )' 1 f'ilt ZU5 z C ,4, i,' * se4I I:CEQ lc ORDER WP. No. 37035 of 2015 ']rHE DISMISSING WRIT PETITION FOR NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS eA o*{ Xx"
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.