Bothli Trade AG, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: K MANMADHA RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-12-02. Bothli Trade AG, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 27234 OF 2015 Between: 1. Bothli Trade AG, Rundbuckstrasse 6, CH-8212, Neuhausen Am Rheinfall, Switzerland Represented by its Attorney Holder Mr. Surinder Verma 2. Mr. Surinder A. P. Coastal Sands Private Limited, Rep by its Director Varma, Having its registered office at Flat No. 807, Block No. 10 Divya Shree Shakthi Apartments, Mayuri Nagar, Miyapur, Hyderabad. ... Petitioner(S) AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce, A. P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development, Corporation Limited, Having its Registered Office at Khanijadhra, Pancom Business Center, 2nd Floor, 8-3-945, Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500 073. 3. The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Mines New Delhi.
... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ of Mandamus, or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, declaring the C. O. Ms. No. 66 dated 10. 08. 2015 issued by the 1®* Respondent and the consequential letter . No. APMDCAPMDC/i-IMBS/BT. Ag12006 dated 14. 08. 2015 of the 2'1 Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, void, violative of the principles of natural justice, vexatious, and infringing on the constitutional and other legal rights of the Petitioners and consequently set aside the same and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interests of justice, equity and good conscience. I. A. NO: 5 OF 2015(WPMP.
NO: 158052 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased I. A. NO: 2 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 35339 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned GO dated 10. 08. 2015 and the letter of the 2^^ Respondent dated 14. 08. 2015. I. A. NO: 1 OF 2015rWVMP. NO: 4714 OF 2015) Between: 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce, A. P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development, Corporation Limited, Having its Registered Office at Khanijadhra, Pancom Business Center, 2nd Floor, 8-3-945, Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500 073. 3. The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Mines New Delhi. ... Petitioner(S) AND 4.
Bothli Trade AG, Rundbuckstrasse 6, CH-8212, Neuhausen Am Rheinfall, Switzerland Represented by its Attorney Holder Mr. Surinder Verma 5. A. P. Coastal Sands Private Limited, Rep by its Director Mr. Surinder Varma, Having its registered office at Flat No. 807, Block No. 10 Divya Shree Shakthi Apartments, Mayuri Nagar, Miyapur, Hyderabad. ... Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders passed by the Hon'ble Court in WPMp No. 35339 of 2015 in WP No. 27234 of 2015 dt. 9-8-2015 and consequential extension orders dt. 8-10-2015 and 18-11-2015. Counsel for the Petitioner(s) :SRI. K MAMATA Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : 7381/Y SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 ; Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA & COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent No.
1 ; GP FOR INDUSTRIES (TG) The Court made the following : ORDER APHC010245862015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 27234/2015 Between; Bothli Trade Ag, and Others ... PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ... RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1. K MAMATA Counsel for the Respondent(S): l. /SaWSUDHAKAR 2. Pasala Ponna Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3. 15509/ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 4. 15508/THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 5. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (TG) The Court made the following: . 4 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioners. On the earlier occasion also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. So, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed. SD/- P. U. V. BHASKARA RAO ASSISTAt^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI. K MAMATA Advocate [OPUC] advocate GENERAL (AP) Advocate 3. One CC to SRI. 7381 A' SUDHAKAR Advocate [OPUC] (AP) Advocate [opuq advoqate general GENERAL SplN^IAAdvicafeloP^^^^^^^^ Rao,DEPUTY SOLICITOR (TG) ,High Court ® Kh? a‘°Prad'Lsh°? c]u? r®^'"^® ^ COMMERCE 7. THREE CD Copies BKB % ✓ HIGH COURT BKB DATED:02/12/2024 ORDER WP. No. 27234 of 2015 % O 2 4 JA. M ) Co. Current beciion ^ Y/ DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.