Ramindla Praveen Kumar v. The SHO Kazipet Police Station
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P NAVEEN RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-17. Ramindla Praveen Kumar v. The SHO Kazipet Police Station. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21725 OF 2020 Between: 1. Ramindla Praveen Kumar, S/o. Parusharamulu, Age. 32 yrs, Occu. Pvt. Employee, Fi"/o. H. No. 2'1-99, Uttam Nagar, tValkajgiri, Hyderabad -500047 2. Ramindla Parusharamulu, S/o. Kajaiah, Age. 65 yrs, Occu. Rtd. Singareni Employee, R/o. H. No. 24-4-22411, Shaslrinagar, Darga Kazipet, Warangal Urban District. 3. Ramindla Vinoda, W/o. Parusharamulu, Age. 55 yrs, Occu. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 24-4-22411 , Shaslrinagar, Darga Kazipet, Warangal Urban District. 4. Ramindla Prasanna Kumar, S/o. Parusharamulu, Age. 28 yrs, Occu. Pvt. Employee, R/o. H. No. 24-4 -22411, Shastrinagar, Darga Kazipet, Warangal Urban District. 5. Mukka Revathi, W/o. Ashok, Age. 33 yrs, Occu. Pvt. Employee, R/o. H. No. 23-91, Flat No. 102, Anandbagh, Ir,,lalkajgiri, Hyderabad - 500047. 6.
Ir/ukka Ashok, S/o. Mallesham, Age. 40 yrs, Occu. Employee, R/o. H. No. 2-27, R/o. H. No. 23-91, Flat No. 102, Anandbagh, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad - 500047. ... PETITIONERS AND 1. The SHO Kazipet Police Station, Warangal District. 2. The SHO, Woman Police Station Urban, Warangal Urban District. 3. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 The Director General of Police, Lakdika Pool, Khairathabad, Hyderabad. 5 Commissioner of Police, Warangal Police Commissionerate, Police Head Quarters, Warangal Town and Urban District 6 Ramindla @ Kalumala Rajasree @ Siri, Wo. Praveen Kumar, D/o. Ramesh Kalumala, Age. 30 years, Occu. Housewife 7 Kalumala Ramesh, S/o. Thirumalaiah, Age. 55 years, Occu. Technician, MIP (sG-1). Both are R/o. H. No. 24-4-224, Shastrinagar, Darga Kazipet, Warangal ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in harassing and interfering with the life, liberty and freedom of the petitioners by way of interfering into the petitioners personal life and liberty without following the due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution of lndia and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents no. 'l and 2 not to harass and interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners. Contd...... lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant STAY directing the respondents no.
1 and 2 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners except in accordance with law pending disposal of the above writ petition in this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI B. S. PRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6&7: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No. 21725 O? 2O2O ORDER: Heard iearned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. 2. Petitioners allege that on a matrimonial issue, the respondent police harassing and intimidating them at the instance of - are respondent No. 6 and 7. 3. According to learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, respondent No. 6 lodged complaint with the Station House Officer, Woman Police Station Urban, Warangal Urban District, respondent No. 2, on 16. 1O. 2O2O and a G. D. entry was made.
He further submits that since the issue relates to matrimonial dispute, counselling exercise was undertaken and in the said process, petitioners were called to the police station. He denied the allegation that the police are harassing or threatening the petitioners. 4. Since complaint is already lodged, it is open to the respondent police - to enquire/investigate into the said complaint and take further steps as warranted by law. However, in the process of investigating into the crime reported, the police are directed to follow due process of law, if the presence of the petitioners is required. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed. SD/-CH. VENKATE SW ULU ASSISTANT R STRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI N OFFICER To, 1. The SHO Kazipet Police Station, Warangal District' Urban, Warangal Urban District 2. The SHO, Woman Police Station 3. The Principal Secretary Department of Home, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4.
The Director General of Police, Lakdika Pool, Khairathabad, Hyderabad. 5. The Commissioner of Police, Warangal Police Commissionerate, Police Head Quarters, Warangal Town and Urban District 6. One CC to Sri. B. S. Prakash Rao, Advocate IOPUCI 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 8. Two C. D. Copies Prk HIGH COURT DATED:1711212020 OF ORDER WP. No. 21725 ol 2020 $ . uu$ ou\ ,.. Disposing of the WP. i0 MB-
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.