Sanjay Tanti v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-18. Sanjay Tanti v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 65517 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -48 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Khagaria ====================================================== Sanjay Tanti Son of Late Chandrashekhar Tanti R/O Vill- Babhangama, P. S. - Gangour, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Patna 2. Ujo Devi W/o Late Parmanand Tanti R/o vill - Babhangama, ward no. 4, Tanti Tola, P. s. - Gangaour, Distt. - Khagaria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Mr. Indrajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 18-12-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khagaria Mahila P. S. Case No.
48 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 64, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of committing rape with the minor dumb daughter of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 8. 1. 2025. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 65517 of 2025(6) dt. 18-12-2025 2/2 5. Learned A. P. P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. He further submits that the victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS has supported the prosecution case. 6. From the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 BNSS, it appears that she was raped by the petitioner. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. 8.
Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.