FAKIR NAIK v. JYOSTNAMAYEE SAHOO
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-09. FAKIR NAIK v. JYOSTNAMAYEE SAHOO. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 666 of 2025 Fakir Naik & Ors. ..... Petitioners Represented by Adv. - Arun Kumar Das 1 -versus- Jyostnamayee Sahoo ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. - CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 09. 04. 2026 Order No. 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. Perused the CMP application as well as the prayer made therein. 3. By filing the present CMP application, the defendants in CS No. 12 of 2023 pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kamakhyanagar has approached this Court thereby challenging order dated 20. 01. 2025. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset contended that by virtue of the impugned order, the learned trial court has allowed the plaintiff’s application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 to the extent that the parties were directed to maintain status quo. 5.
On a close scrutiny of the impugned order dated 20. 01. 2025, this Court found that the learned trial court by virtue of a detailed order has directed the parties to maintain status quo in respect of Page 1 of 2. the suit land. On a further scrutiny of order dated 20. 01. 2025 at Annexure-3, this Court is of the view that the same doesn’t require any interference by this court. However, taking into consideration the prayer made by the learned counsel for the Petitioners to direct the learned trial to expedite the suit, this Court, while disposing of the present CMP application, grants liberty to the Petitioners to move the learned trial court by filing an application for early disposal of suit in question. In the event any such application is filed, the learned trial court, subject to pendency of cases being taken up, make an attempt to ensure that the present suit is disposed of in a time bound manner. 6.
With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the CMP application stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A. K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil Page 2 of 2.
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.