Abdul Rashid Abdul Majid Ansari Since deceased, through legal heirsandrepresentatives Ansari Rasheed v. Gulam Mohamed Wajid Ali Since Decease Through his Heirs and legal representatives Rafiq Shaikh Since
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2025-12-09. Abdul Rashid Abdul Majid Ansari Since deceased, through legal heirsandrepresentatives Ansari Rasheed v. Gulam...
Judgment text
Digitally 903. CP. 256. 2025. doc signed by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Date: CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 2025. 12. 09 19:15:02 +0530 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 256 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 574 OF 2011 Abdul Rashid Abdul Majid Ansari (deceased) through Lrs. Ansari Ayesha Abdul Rasheed & Ors. … Petitioners Versus Gulam Mohamed Wajid Ali (deceased) Rafiq Gulam Mohamed Shaikh (deceased) through Lrs. Naushaba Rafique Shaikh & Ors. … Respondents. *** Mr. Shrikant Rathi for the Petitioners. Mr. Satyavan N. Vaishnav a/w. Mr. Armaan Grewal i/b. M/s. N. N. Vaishnawa & Co. for the Respondent Nos. 1(a)(i), 1(a)(ii), 1(a)(iii), 1(a)(v), 1(c) and 1(d) Mr. Ansari Salman Abdul Rasheed, Petitioner No. 1C present in the Court. *** CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J. th DATED : 9 DECEMBER 2025 P. C. : 1. This Contempt Petition is arising out of the alleged breach of the order dated 24/11/2011.
According to the Petitioners, the statement made about rd not creating 3 party interest or parting with possession was breached. 2. Today, the main Civil Revision Application in which above order dated 24/11/2011 was passed, has been disposed of as withdrawn, because the parties have settled the dispute amicable and the possession of the subject matter gala has been received by the Petitioners. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel Mr. Vaishnav that since the possession is already handed over, alleged contempt if any, stands purged. akn 1/2 903. CP. 256. 2025. doc 4. Notice under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is not issued. As the Petitioners have received the possession of the subject matter gala, I do not see any reason to keep the Contempt Petition pending. 5. Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of. (M. M. SATHAYE, J. ) akn 2/2
Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.