G.Manish Kumar v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-17. G.Manish Kumar v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
I [ 31s8 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6738 OF 2O2O Between: G. Manish Kumar, S/o G. Shiv Kumar Petitioner/Accused No. 2 AND State of Telangana, through Station House Officer, PS Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. Respondent Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P. C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in CC. No. B781 of 2020 (Crime No. 33B/2020, Banajara Hills PS) on the file of III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Nampally, Hyderabad pending trial.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds flled in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S PILLIX LAW FIRM Advocate for the Petitioner and the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Sole Respondent, the Court made the following. ORDER: THE H()NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHNIAN PETITION No. 6738 OF 2020 !. lLIMlNAL ORDE,R: This is an application for anticipatory bail. The petitionel is A. 2 in Crin. re ]r;o. 338 of 2020 on the file of the Station House Off icer. Banjara Hills t'olice Station relating to C. C. No. 8781 of 2020 on the file of III Acditional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, -[he Hyderabad. offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 406 and 420 lPC. 2. Hear,l I\4/s. Pilix Law Firm, lor the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent and perused the record 3. As per the charge sheet, the petitioner/A. i , Managing Director of N4/s. Suvarna Avani Estates. has involved in three crirnes viz: Cr.
Nos. l3l, 185 and 338 of 2020. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, three purchasers of plots have lodged the said complaints and the Police have registered the above said three crimes. A. 1, Managing Director of the said Company, was anested by the Police and he u'as enlarged on bail. fhe petitioner herein/A. 2 is only a Marketing Marager of the said Company and he has no intention ro cheat the defa,:to-complainant and there is no mention about the \ 1t specific role played by the petitionerlA. 2 in the contmission ol offence. The Police have already completed investigation and filed charge sheet in tl)ctober, 2020 itselt'. 6. Consideri rg the said tacts and also the lact that the Police have alreadl, arrested the A. 1, Managing Dire ctor ol. the Cornpanv and thc' ) petitioner herein/A. 2 is only a Marketing Manager of said Company, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner A. 2. - 7 .
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following conditions: i) The petitioner A. 2 is directed to surrender before the III - Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, within a period of fifteen (15) days from today, and on such surrender, the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, shall release the petitioner - A. 2 on bail on his executing personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. ii) The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in -A. 2 Section 438 (2) of Cr. P. C. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/-M. RAMANA KRI HNA ASSISTAN EG RAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To, I 1. The lll Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate court at Nampally, Hyderabad. 2.
The Station House Officer, Banjara Hills poljce Station, Hydeibad 3. One CC to M/S PILLIX LAW FtRM Advocate [OpUC] 4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad [OUT] 5. One spare Copy , HIGH COURT KL,J DATED:1711212t. 020 \ -a // n G a itr . L ! , I \i$ttsD tl i','?. \i . "V , ORDER CRLP. No. 6738 of 2020 BAIL
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.